Skip to main content

Security report for ceresit.md

Henkel · Manufacturing · Moldova

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ceresit.md is a regional website representing the Ceresit brand under the Henkel group, offering a broad portfolio of construction chemical products such as cladding systems, waterproofing, thermal insulation, and plasters. The site targets construction professionals and consumers in Moldova and nearby markets, reflecting a mature and well-established business model within the manufacturing sector. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides multi-language support, indicating a strong digital maturity level. Technically, it leverages Adobe Experience Manager CMS, Adobe Analytics, and RAQN CIAM for identity management, demonstrating a modern and scalable infrastructure. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforced, security headers present, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. Overall, the site reflects a trustworthy and credible business presence with strong branding consistency and adherence to best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ceresit.md

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ceresit.md, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ceresit.md right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Ceresit as a key player in the construction chemical manufacturing sector under the Henkel umbrella. Its business model focuses on product manufacturing and distribution, targeting both professional and consumer segments. The presence of multiple regional domains and language versions suggests a broad geographic footprint and market penetration strategy. The use of advanced digital tools and analytics indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement and marketing. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site suggests a controlled communication channel, likely centralized through contact forms and parent company infrastructure. No certifications or security policies are explicitly published, which could be an area for future enhancement to boost trust and compliance visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and multiple security headers implemented. The use of RAQN CIAM indicates a managed identity and access management system, enhancing user authentication security. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. No security policy or incident response information is published, which limits transparency in security governance. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided HTML content. The security score is high but could be improved by publishing explicit security policies and incident response contacts. Overall, the site is secure for typical business operations with no immediate risks identified.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Add data protection officer contact details to enhance GDPR transparency.
  5. Consider adding direct verified contact emails and phone numbers for customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Henkel
Description
Ceresit offers a wide range of construction solutions including cladding systems, putties, waterproofing, thermal insulation, plasters and more.
Key services
Construction chemical solutions, Waterproofing, Thermal insulation, Plasters, Cladding systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Adobe Helix RUM, RAQN CIAM, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Adobe Analytics
Frameworks
Adobe Helix, RAQN Commerce
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • Use of CIAM for authentication
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Analytics
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, Adobe Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong branding consistency with Henkel parent company.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  4. No exposed security vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact is via form.
  6. Multiple language and regional versions available indicating broad market coverage.
  7. Use of modern technologies and Adobe Experience Manager CMS.
  8. No evidence of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, leveraging Adobe Helix RUM for performance monitoring and RAQN CIAM for customer identity and access management. It uses OneTrust for cookie consent management and Adobe Analytics for user behavior tracking. The site is well-structured with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is optimized with preconnect and preload hints for images and scripts. The hosting appears to be managed by Henkel or a trusted CDN provider. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The technical stack is modern and supports scalability and security. Opportunities exist to enhance technical documentation and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ceresit.md. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ceresit.md.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.