Skip to main content

Security report for centrumespira.nl

Tabitha Zijlstra · Other · Netherlands

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tabitha Zijlstra operates a personal development and spiritual guidance business based in the Netherlands, offering individual and group training sessions focused on soul purpose and consciousness transformation. The website serves as a professional platform to showcase services, share content, and provide contact avenues. The business targets individuals and groups seeking personal growth and healing, positioning itself in a niche market with a clear service offering. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins for forms, cookie management, and analytics. It uses HTTPS with Google reCAPTCHA for form security and a cookie consent mechanism that complies with GDPR. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as encrypted connections, privacy-friendly analytics configuration, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks advanced security headers and a published security policy or incident response contact, which could enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, suitable for a small personal business. Strategic improvements in security policies and accessibility could further strengthen its posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching centrumespira.nl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the personal development and spiritual coaching sector, focusing on soul-based life coaching and group trainings. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized, heart-centered guidance and a niche market presence in the Netherlands. Revenue streams are primarily from training sessions, individual coaching, and workshops. The target customers are individuals and groups interested in self-awareness and healing. The company maintains a modest but consistent digital presence with social media integration and a clear contact strategy. There is no indication of parent or subsidiary companies, suggesting an independent small business model.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, reflecting GDPR compliance. No security headers beyond standard HTTPS were detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of exposed sensitive data and use of privacy-friendly analytics settings are positive indicators. The site would benefit from additional security headers and a formal security policy to improve transparency and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Monitor third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure ongoing privacy compliance and minimize tracking risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tabitha Zijlstra
Registration number
52351254
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tabitha Zijlstra
Description
Persoonlijke begeleiding en trainingen gericht op zielsbestemming, zelfontwikkeling en bewustzijnsverandering.
Key services
Individuele begeleiding, Relatiebegeleiding, Familieopstellingen, Trainingen zoals Thuiskomen in de Cirkel
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookies and Content Security Policy plugin, Contact Form 7, Leaflet.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal business site for spiritual and personal development services.
  2. Content is in Dutch and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for forms, cookies, and analytics.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user control.
  5. No security blocking or WAF detected; site is fully accessible.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, address, and contact form.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. No certifications or formal security frameworks mentioned.
  9. Social media presence includes YouTube, WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using standard plugins including Contact Form 7, Cookies and Content Security Policy, and Google Analytics integrations. It uses jQuery and Leaflet.js for interactive elements. The site loads asynchronously loaded scripts for analytics and reCAPTCHA, indicating a modern approach to performance. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with custom fonts and consistent branding. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but security headers and advanced accessibility features are limited.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with centrumespira.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centrumespira.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.