Skip to main content

Security report for centrelink.gov.au

Services Australia · Government · Australia

Partial score · DNS & email only

61/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Services Australia operates as the Australian Government agency responsible for delivering social security and welfare payments, including Centrelink services. The website provides comprehensive information on various payments such as Parental Leave Pay, Family Tax Benefit, Youth Allowance, JobSeeker Payment, Disability Support Pension, and Age Pension. The site targets individuals seeking government support and is positioned as a key national service provider in the social welfare sector. The business model is government-funded service delivery with a focus on accessibility and public service.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching centrelink.gov.au

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
61

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website reflects a mature government digital presence with strong branding consistency and high trust indicators, including the use of a .gov.au domain and official logos. The target audience is primarily Australian individuals requiring social welfare support. The agency leverages partnerships with related government portals such as myGov and Child Support Agency to provide integrated services. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on public service delivery. The site’s content quality and navigation support a positive user experience, reinforcing its market position as a trusted government resource.

Security posture

The site enforces HTTPS and integrates security monitoring tools such as New Relic and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a proactive approach to security and performance monitoring. While explicit security headers are not visible in the HTML, it is likely they are configured at the server level given the government context. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies suggests room for improvement in compliance transparency. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and security.txt publication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish and prominently link comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement a clear cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  3. Verify and document security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Services Australia
Description
We have payments and services to support you.
Key services
Parental Leave Pay, Family Tax Benefit, Youth Allowance, JobSeeker Payment, Disability Support Pension, Age Pension
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, New Relic Browser Agent, Drupal CMS
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring scripts (New Relic, Clarity)
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser Agent
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, New Relic
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, New Relic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official Australian government website for Centrelink services
  2. Comprehensive social welfare payment information
  3. Modern, accessible, and mobile-optimized design
  4. Use of reputable analytics and monitoring tools
  5. No visible security or privacy policy pages in provided HTML
  6. WHOIS data is limited due to privacy and auDA policies
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS and employs modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and New Relic for analytics and performance monitoring. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with fast loading times and comprehensive SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. The technical infrastructure reflects a mature, enterprise-grade government digital platform with strong emphasis on user experience and operational monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with centrelink.gov.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centrelink.gov.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.