Skip to main content

Security report for centralni-adresa.net

Galileo Corporation s.r.o. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website centralni-adresa.net serves as an informational portal for a Czech government registry concerning declarations of activities, property, income, gifts, and liabilities under law 159/2006 Sb. The site is operated by Galileo Corporation s.r.o., a small company providing niche registry services to public officials and government entities. The content is primarily legal and regulatory in nature, targeting officials and citizens interested in conflict of interest declarations. The site is modest in design and content quality, with basic navigation and limited interactivity. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with resources hosted on the same domain. The site uses HTTPS, but lacks visible advanced security headers such as CSP or HSTS. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern frameworks, and the site appears to have been last updated in 2017, indicating potential technical debt and outdated content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but present. From a security perspective, the site does not expose sensitive data or forms on the main page, which reduces risk. However, the absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies indicates gaps in compliance and best practices. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency and legitimacy, although the site content and footer indicate a legitimate business operator. Overall, the site is functional and serves its informational purpose but requires improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching centralni-adresa.net

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the government sector, providing a centralized registry service mandated by Czech law for conflict of interest declarations. Its market position is niche and essential for public administration transparency. The business model revolves around maintaining and providing access to official registries, likely funded or contracted by government entities. The target customers are public officials, government bodies, and citizens seeking registry information. The company, Galileo Corporation s.r.o., appears to be a small entity focused on this specialized service. There is a partnership or association with profesionalita.cz, possibly for hosting or professional services. The lack of updated content and minimal digital marketing or analytics presence suggests limited growth initiatives or digital maturity. No evident revenue streams or commercial activities are visible on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or user input fields are present on the main page, minimizing attack surface. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. The missing WHOIS data is a significant concern for domain legitimacy and trust. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for improvement in headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to enhance security.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain registration transparency and trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Update website content and technical stack to improve performance, accessibility, and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Galileo Corporation s.r.o.
Description
Registr oznámení o činnostech, oznámení o majetku a oznámení o příjmech, darech a závazcích dle zákona č. 159/2006 Sb., o střetu zájmů, ve znění pozdějších předpisů.
Key services
Registry of declarations of activities, Registry of property declarations, Registry of income, gifts, and liabilities declarations
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by base href https://)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data on main page

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is informational and focused on Czech government registry for conflict of interest declarations.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found on main page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. No forms present on the main page to collect user data.
  5. Site uses HTTPS and includes JavaScript and CSS resources hosted on same domain.
  6. Footer indicates site last updated in 2017, which may indicate outdated content.
  7. No social media links or analytics scripts detected.
  8. No security headers visible in provided data.
  9. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It loads scripts and stylesheets from its own domain, indicating self-hosting or dedicated hosting. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern web frameworks. The site is moderately performant but last updated in 2017, suggesting potential technical debt. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but present. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user data collection. The lack of security headers and modern security practices is a technical risk. The domain's WHOIS data is missing, which may indicate registration or DNS configuration issues. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but outdated and lacking in modern security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with centralni-adresa.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centralni-adresa.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.