Skip to main content

Security report for celakovice.cz

Město Čelákovice · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Město Čelákovice operates as the official municipal government website for the town of Čelákovice in the Czech Republic. It provides residents and visitors with comprehensive information about city administration, public services, events, and contact details. The website is positioned as a trusted local government resource with a focus on transparency and community engagement. The business model is public service oriented, targeting local citizens and stakeholders. Technically, the website uses the Public4u CMS platform with common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for UI enhancements. The site is mobile optimized and provides a moderate performance experience. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. The site employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. From a security perspective, the site has a good SSL configuration but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No vulnerabilities or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust slightly, but the official nature and content quality support legitimacy. Overall, the site is a well-maintained municipal portal with good content quality and user experience. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and WHOIS data clarity would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching celakovice.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as the primary digital presence for the town of Čelákovice, providing essential government services and information. Its market position is that of a local government authority, with no commercial revenue streams. The target audience includes residents, local businesses, and visitors. The partnership ecosystem includes regional government bodies and service providers such as parking management and regional development agencies. The site demonstrates stable operations with regular content updates and event listings, indicating active community engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking services, reducing privacy risks. Recommendations include adding security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and incident response policy to facilitate vulnerability reporting and transparency.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Consider adding minimal analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to monitor user engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Město Čelákovice
VAT number
CZ00240117
Registration number
00 240 117
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Město Čelákovice
Description
Official municipal website providing information about the town of Čelákovice, including city administration, services, events, and public notices.
Key services
City administration information, Public notices and news, Event calendar, Contact information, Online forms and services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Public4u CMS, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal website with comprehensive local government information.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a government domain.
  3. Good content quality and navigation.
  4. Cookie consent implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No visible security headers detected; room for improvement.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy respect.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing present.
  8. Multiple external partner domains linked, consistent with municipal partnerships.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy but stable technology stack centered around the Public4u CMS and jQuery libraries. The presence of Swiper.js indicates some modern UI components. The site is mobile responsive and includes print stylesheets. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. The lack of advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries suggests potential for modernization. No CDN or hosting provider information was found. The site uses standard HTML5 and CSS with some inline JavaScript for UI interactions.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with celakovice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review celakovice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.