Skip to main content

Security report for cebianet.cz

Cebia · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CebiaNET is a professional service portal associated with the Cebia brand, providing login access for professional users likely related to automotive or related sectors. The website presents a clean, professional interface with a focus on secure user authentication. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, and ASP.NET MVC framework, indicating a mature and maintainable platform. Security practices such as HTTPS usage and CSRF tokens are implemented, though some security headers are missing and cookie consent mechanisms are absent, which could be improved to enhance compliance and security posture. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration transparency but does not detract significantly from the perceived legitimacy given the professional branding and contact information. Overall, the site is functional, secure, and targeted at a professional audience with moderate risk and room for improvement in privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cebianet.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CebiaNET operates as a service portal for professional users under the Cebia brand, which is well-established in its sector. The business model centers on providing secure access to professional services, likely in automotive data or related fields. The site targets professionals requiring login credentials provided by sales representatives, indicating a B2B focus. The partnership with the main Cebia website strengthens brand trust and market positioning. The lack of extensive contact details or public business registrations on the site suggests a controlled access model. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital services and improving transparency around privacy and security policies to meet evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure login form practices including CSRF tokens and password masking. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent and explicit GDPR statements. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with clear areas for enhancement to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response policies including contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and meet standards.
  5. Increase transparency around business registration and data protection officer contact information to build trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cebia
Description
CebiaNET provides services for professionals related to Cebia, likely in automotive or related sectors given the parent brand. The site is targeted at professional users with login access to services.
Key services
Professional services access, User login portal
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, ASP.NET
Frameworks
ASP.NET MVC
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • CSRF token in login form
  • Password input type used

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain registration insights.
  3. Site uses modern frontend technologies and standard security practices for login forms.
  4. No cookie consent or explicit GDPR compliance mechanisms detected.
  5. Contact information is limited to a single email address in the footer.
  6. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policies found.
  7. Content is professional and targeted at business users.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, FontAwesome for icons, and ASP.NET MVC for backend framework. The site loads external fonts and scripts from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. Mobile optimization is good with responsive navigation and layout. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or framework-based implementation. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cebianet.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cebianet.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.