Skip to main content

Security report for cearasc.com

Ceará Sporting Club · Other · Brazil

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ceará Sporting Club operates an official website primarily targeting its fan base and supporters, offering membership registration, merchandise sales, ticketing, and club benefits. The site is well-branded and consistent with the club's identity, providing multiple external links to partner platforms that support fan engagement and commerce. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies such as jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, and integrates Cloudflare Insights for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing WHOIS registration data, introduces concerns regarding compliance and domain legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers and formal incident response information. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy from a content perspective but requires improvements in compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cearasc.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
30
Email security
77
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Ceará Sporting Club as a regional football club with a medium-sized fan base in Brazil. Its business model revolves around fan engagement through membership programs (Sócio Vozão), merchandise sales via a virtual store, ticketing services, and supplier registration. The club leverages partnerships with related domains to extend its service offerings. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information limits deeper business intelligence. The site’s external links and social media presence indicate active community engagement and marketing efforts. Growth potential is tied to expanding membership and digital commerce channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data. The site loads third-party scripts asynchronously, which is good practice, but the presence of external push notification scripts and analytics beacons requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which limits readiness for handling security events. Overall, the site should enhance its security headers, formalize privacy compliance, and publish incident response contacts to improve trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and global compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Conduct a security audit of third-party scripts and remove or update any vulnerable libraries.
  5. Improve accessibility features to enhance usability for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ceará Sporting Club
Description
Official website of Ceará Sporting Club, a Brazilian football (soccer) club. The site provides links to membership registration, virtual store, ticketing, and club advantages.
Key services
Sócio Vozão (Membership), Virtual Store, Ticketing (Vozão Tickets), Supplier registration, Club de Vantagens (Benefits Club), Mobile App
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1 slim, FontAwesome 5.0.13, Google Fonts (Roboto), Cloudflare Insights beacon, Custom JavaScript (of_webchat.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URLs)
  • Async loading of scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
Webpushs (push notifications)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the landing page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the main page.
  4. Social media links to Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube are present and appear legitimate.
  5. No forms detected on the landing page; user interaction is via external links.
  6. Use of modern web fonts and icon libraries indicates moderate technical maturity.
  7. No explicit security headers or advanced security configurations detected in provided data.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but relatively simple technology stack including jQuery (slim), FontAwesome icons, Google Fonts, and custom JavaScript for chat functionality. It integrates Cloudflare Insights for analytics and uses asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. The site is mobile responsive and has good navigation clarity. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. The lack of visible security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. The WHOIS data absence is a technical anomaly that should be investigated to confirm domain registration legitimacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cearasc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cearasc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.