Skip to main content

Security report for cdrs.lu

Comité du Risque Systémique · Government · Luxembourg

High risk. 16 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website cdrs.lu represents the Comité du Risque Systémique, an institutional entity likely focused on systemic risk in Luxembourg. The site is primarily informational, presented in French, and built on WordPress using the Divi theme. The technical infrastructure is standard for a small institutional website, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. However, the site lacks critical privacy and security policies, contact information, and advanced security headers, which limits its compliance and trustworthiness. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating full accessibility. The WHOIS data shows Luxembourg-based name servers consistent with the domain's country code but lacks detailed registrant information, limiting full legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is safe and suitable for general audiences but requires improvements in privacy, security, and contact transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

16 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Oracle

      Port 1521 (Oracle) is publicly accessible - Oracle - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Oracle using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cdrs.lu

This scan found 33 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Comité du Risque Systémique appears to be a small institutional or governmental committee focused on systemic risk, targeting French-speaking stakeholders in Luxembourg. The business model is informational and regulatory in nature, with no commercial services or products offered. The website does not reveal partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The lack of detailed business information and contact data suggests a low-profile institutional presence. The site’s market positioning is unclear but likely serves a niche governmental or financial oversight role. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the website content.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is minimal. There is no evidence of security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and SSL/TLS configuration details are unavailable. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. The site does not appear to expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is low, and improvements are needed to meet modern compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information including security contact emails.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for transparency.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities and improve SSL/TLS configuration.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Comité du Risque Systémique
Description
The website represents the Comité du Risque Systémique, likely a committee focused on systemic risk, presumably in Luxembourg given the domain .lu and language French. The site content is in French and appears to be informational about the committee's activities.
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Google Fonts, jQuery (custom implementation)
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is informational for a Luxembourg systemic risk committee.
  2. Content is in French and uses WordPress with Divi theme.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in content.
  5. No security or incident response policies detected.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. WHOIS data limited but consistent with Luxembourg domain usage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Divi theme, a common and flexible platform for institutional websites. Google Fonts are used for typography, and a custom jQuery implementation is present. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a basic SEO setup with meta tags. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of advanced caching or CDN usage. Accessibility features are basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or enhanced accessibility markup detected. The technical stack is standard but could benefit from modernization and performance tuning. Hosting provider details are not available from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cdrs.lu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cdrs.lu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.