Skip to main content

Security report for cdc.lv

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

70/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website cdc.lv currently serves a security CAPTCHA challenge page powered by BitNinja, designed to prevent automated malicious access. The page does not provide any business-related content or services but acts as a gatekeeper to the actual site content. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA and BitNinja branding indicates a focus on bot mitigation and cybersecurity. The lack of accessible WHOIS data due to query limits and absence of contact or policy information limits the ability to assess the business legitimacy and compliance posture. Technically, the site uses legacy CMS indicators (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5 meta tags) and modern analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Tag Manager. The page is basic in design and functionality, optimized minimally for mobile, and lacks SEO and accessibility features. Security best practices are partially implemented through CAPTCHA but lack visible HTTP security headers and SSL configuration details. The security posture is moderate due to the active bot protection but is weakened by missing security headers, unavailable WHOIS data, and absence of privacy and cookie policies. The site is currently inaccessible without CAPTCHA validation, which significantly impacts content quality and business credibility assessments. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile with critical gaps in transparency, compliance, and user experience. Strategic improvements in security headers, policy disclosures, and WHOIS transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cdc.lv

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
70

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the nature of the page being a security CAPTCHA challenge, no direct business information, market positioning, or revenue model is discernible. The site appears to be protected by BitNinja, a cybersecurity service, suggesting the domain or its visitors have triggered security rules. No contact details, company names, or sector information is available. The use of Google Analytics indicates some level of visitor tracking and marketing awareness. The lack of business content and policies suggests this page is a temporary or protective layer rather than a business-facing site.

Security posture

The website employs Google reCAPTCHA v2 and BitNinja greylist CAPTCHA to mitigate automated malicious traffic, indicating a proactive security measure. However, the absence of visible HTTP security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) and no SSL/TLS configuration details reduce the overall security maturity. The WHOIS data is inaccessible due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are missing, reducing transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, compliance, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve security posture.
  2. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and domain registration information is transparent to enhance trustworthiness.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform visitors about data handling.
  4. Improve accessibility and SEO features to enhance user experience and site discoverability.
  5. Establish clear contact and incident response channels to improve transparency and security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The website content is a security CAPTCHA challenge page by BitNinja indicating visitor IP is greylisted and requires CAPTCHA validation to proceed. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
This page is a security CAPTCHA challenge page presented by BitNinja to validate visitors and prevent automated malicious access. It does not contain business descriptive content.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS Reset, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2, BitNinja security scripts
Frameworks
Joomla! 1.5, WordPress 2.5 (meta tags only)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security challenge page to prevent automated access

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently blocked by BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge
  2. No business or marketing content present on the page
  3. No contact information or policies found
  4. Uses outdated CMS versions indicated in meta tags (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5)
  5. Includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts
  6. No visible security headers or SSL configuration details
  7. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on legacy CMS platforms indicated by meta tags referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and may pose security risks if still in use. The page uses standard HTML5 and CSS reset styles with JavaScript for language translation and CAPTCHA integration. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts are included for visitor tracking and marketing analytics. The site is currently a security challenge page with minimal content, impacting performance and user experience. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features detected. The hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not discernible from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is basic and requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cdc.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cdc.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.