Skip to main content

Security report for ccs-fabricframe.de

CCS fabric frame · Manufacturing · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CCS fabric frame is a German-based medium-sized company specializing in the design and production of advertising surfaces using high-quality textile printing and patented tension frame systems. The company serves a B2B market, targeting sectors such as retail, events, office solutions, healthcare, and hospitality. Their market position is that of a quality-focused manufacturer with local production in Düsseldorf and international clientele. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive product information, multiple contact channels, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, enhanced by SEO and security plugins, and integrates Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for user tracking and spam prevention. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and forms protected, though some HTTP security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is robust with clear GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for user experience and SEO.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ccs-fabricframe.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
45
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors, focusing on textile printing and fabric frame solutions for advertising and interior design. Their business model includes direct sales, white label services, and project consulting. The presence of career links and a digital brochure indicates growth orientation and marketing sophistication. Partnerships with platforms like join.com for recruitment and a dedicated catalog subdomain suggest a structured ecosystem. The company emphasizes local production quality and fast, reliable service, positioning itself as a premium provider in its niche. The website's multilingual support (German and English) indicates an international market approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA on all forms, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The lack of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page is a minor gap. Security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected and should be implemented. Overall, the security posture is good but can be strengthened with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to enhance security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance data retention and privacy policy details regarding analytics and user data handling.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CCS fabric frame
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CCS fabric frame
Description
Starke Marken brauchen Raum - und wir gestalten ihn. Mit hochwertigem Textildruck und patentiertem Spannrahmensystem.
Key services
Textildruck (textile printing), Fabric frame systems (Classic frame, LED frame, Acoustic frame), Consulting and project support, White label services, Shipping and logistics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, WooCommerce 10.1.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Google Analytics (GA4), Trustmary embed, PopMake popup plugin, Flatpickr datepicker, Dropzone.js for file uploads
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v2 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (inferred from WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (GA4)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Trustmary
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Professional and consistent branding with clear business focus.
  3. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, physical addresses, and forms with anti-spam measures.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response info publicly available.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with visible policies and consent mechanisms.
  8. Social media presence on major platforms.
  9. Multiple popup forms for newsletter, contact, and project inquiries with reCAPTCHA protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, Yoast SEO for search optimization, and Google Analytics for traffic analysis. It employs Google reCAPTCHA v2 to protect forms from spam and abuse. The hosting appears to be with 1&1 IONOS, inferred from nameservers. The site is well-structured with responsive design, optimized images, and multiple interactive elements such as carousels and popups. Performance is fast with minified CSS and JS caching. Accessibility is good with semantic HTML and ARIA labels. The technical stack is mature and well-maintained, supporting a professional online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ccs-fabricframe.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ccs-fabricframe.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.