Skip to main content

Security report for ccfltd.co.uk

CCF · Other · United Kingdom

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CCF is a UK-registered company with a website currently under maintenance, providing minimal content and no direct service descriptions. The site includes company registration and address information but lacks privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies. The technical infrastructure includes common web fonts, icon libraries, and multiple third-party tracking and chat scripts, hosted via AWS Cloudfront CDN. The site is mobile responsive but lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which impacts its security posture negatively. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, limiting user engagement and trust. Overall, the website's current state reflects a basic digital presence with significant room for improvement in content, security, and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ccfltd.co.uk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company appears to be an established UK entity with a physical office and registration details consistent with the website. The lack of detailed business descriptions or services on the site limits insight into market positioning or business model. The presence of multiple tracking and chat tools suggests an intent to engage users and collect analytics data. The website's maintenance status may indicate ongoing updates or restructuring. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The business targets local customers or clients who may contact branches directly during the maintenance period.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS, lack of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No forms or input fields are present to assess secure data handling. The site does not display incident response or security policy information, indicating low maturity in security governance. Recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and auditing third-party scripts for vulnerabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve transparency.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve trust and user support.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential security vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CCF
Registration number
01632482
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CCF
Description
CCF is a company registered in England with a registered office at Lodge Way House, Lodge Way, Harlestone Road, Northampton NN5 7UG. The website is currently under maintenance and does not provide detailed business descriptions or services on the page.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
FontAwesome, Google Fonts, SessionCam Recorder, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Twitter Conversion Tracking, MyLiveChat
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, SessionCam Recorder, Twitter Conversion Tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Twitter Conversion Tracking
Marketing tools
SessionCam Recorder, MyLiveChat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is currently under maintenance with minimal content
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Physical address and company registration details are present in footer
  5. Multiple third-party tracking and chat scripts are loaded
  6. No HTTPS detected in provided URL or HTML content
  7. No forms or interactive elements present
  8. Mobile responsive design implemented via CSS media queries
  9. No security headers or advanced security features detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies including FontAwesome for icons, Google Fonts for typography, and multiple analytics and chat tools such as Google Analytics, SessionCam Recorder, Twitter Conversion Tracking, and MyLiveChat. The site is hosted on AWS Cloudfront CDN, which supports performance and availability. CSS media queries provide good mobile responsiveness. However, the site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for modern web security. The HTML and CSS appear valid but the site content is minimal due to maintenance status. SEO optimization is poor with no meta tags or structured data present.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ccfltd.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ccfltd.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.