Security report for ccee.eu
Consiglio Conferenze Episcopali Europee · Government · Italy
The Consiglio Conferenze Episcopali Europee (CCEE) website serves as the official online presence for the Council of European Episcopal Conferences, a non-profit religious organization coordinating Catholic episcopal conferences across Europe. The site provides comprehensive information about the organization's structure, activities, media resources, and upcoming events, targeting church officials and interested public audiences. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support, reflecting a moderate to high level of digital maturity. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing popular plugins such as Events Manager and WPML for event scheduling and multilingual content respectively. The site employs modern web technologies including jQuery and the Foundation CSS framework, ensuring good mobile responsiveness and user experience. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on Google Fonts and CDN resources. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses nonce tokens in AJAX calls, but lacks visible advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is justified for this type of organization. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were detected, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image consistent with its organizational role. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy and cookie policy visibility, implementing comprehensive security headers, and conducting regular security audits to maintain compliance and trust.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- NIS2 outside view
- Not assessed
- GDPR outside view
- Not assessed
Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.
Priority findings
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
- CWE-327
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V12.1.1
- RFC 8996
- RFC 7568
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: tls_versions TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-8(1): NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8(1): Cryptographic Protection
- High
SSL Certificate Expires Soon
SSL certificate expires in 19 days
What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
- NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
- High
DNS health
DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.
- High
Weak SPF Policy
SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email
What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching ccee.eu
This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 52
- Email security
- 70
- DNS health
- 60
- Network security
- 100
- Average
- 71
Not counted
- Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
- GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
- Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to strengthen security posture.
- Conduct regular security audits and update WordPress core and plugins promptly to mitigate vulnerabilities.
- Publish incident response and security policy information to enhance transparency and trust.
- Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Consiglio Conferenze Episcopali Europee
- Description
- The Consiglio Conferenze Episcopali Europee (CCEE) is an organization representing the Council of European Episcopal Conferences. It serves as a coordinating body for Catholic episcopal conferences across Europe, facilitating collaboration, communication, and joint activities among member conferences. The website provides information about the organization, its presidency, secretariat, members, commissions, activities, media, events calendar, and contact details.
- Key services
- Information dissemination about CCEE activities, Event and meeting coordination, Publication of news, reports, and official communications, Providing access to media resources (videos, photos)
- Content quality
- good
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- jQuery, WordPress, Events Manager plugin, Responsive Lightbox, SiteOrigin Panels, WPML (multilingual CMS), Font Awesome
- Frameworks
- Foundation CSS framework
- Platforms
- WordPress CMS
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- basic
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 75/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- No visible exposed sensitive data
- Use of nonce tokens in AJAX calls (Events Manager plugin)
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Piwik (Matomo)
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- basic
Advertising
- Tracking pixels
- Piwik (Matomo)
- Transparency
- basic
Site quality
- Design
- good
- User experience
- good
- Content relevance
- good
- Navigation
- good
- Professionalism
- good
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
- WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection and EURid policy
- Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for events and multilingual support
- No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages detected in the provided content
- No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content
- Site uses HTTPS and includes tracking via Piwik (Matomo)
- Content is professional, relevant, and targeted at European Catholic audiences
- No security policy or incident response information publicly visible
- No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with ccee.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ccee.eu.