Skip to main content

Security report for cccv.de

Chaos Computer Club Veranstaltungsgesellschaft mbH · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Chaos Computer Club Veranstaltungsgesellschaft mbH website presents a minimalistic online presence focused on providing services and infrastructure for Chaos Computer Club events. The business appears to be a niche service provider within the Chaos Computer Club community, targeting a general audience interested in technology and event organization. The website content is very basic, with limited textual information and no interactive elements or detailed business descriptions. From a technical perspective, the website lacks modern enhancements such as HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms. There is no evidence of advanced CMS or analytics tools, indicating a low digital maturity level. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges but offers minimal SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and security headers, which exposes users to potential risks. The lack of contact information and incident response channels further limits trust and compliance with data protection regulations. The WHOIS data is restricted by DENIC policies but shows no suspicious indicators, suggesting the domain is legitimate and appropriate for the business. Overall, the website scores moderately low on AI evaluation due to minimal content, weak security, and privacy compliance gaps. Strategic improvements in security, privacy, and content richness are recommended to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cccv.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
18
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as an important entity within the niche sector of event services for the Chaos Computer Club community. Its business model revolves around providing infrastructure and services tailored to chaotic technology events. Market positioning is specialized and community-focused, with no indication of broader commercial ambitions. The lack of detailed business information and contact data limits visibility into revenue streams or partnerships. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the website content. The company likely relies on community reputation and event participation rather than extensive digital marketing or sales channels.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low, with critical gaps such as missing HTTPS, absence of security headers, and no visible incident response or data protection policies. These deficiencies increase the risk of data interception, phishing, and non-compliance with GDPR or other regulations. The lack of cookie consent and privacy policy details further weakens privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected, but the minimal security posture suggests a need for urgent improvements. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not present, indicating limited organizational focus on security.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  5. Enhance website content quality and navigation to improve user experience and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Chaos Computer Club Veranstaltungsgesellschaft mbH
Description
Services und Infrastruktur für Chaosevents.
Key services
Services und Infrastruktur für Chaosevents
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is minimalistic with very limited content.
  2. No forms or interactive elements detected.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers visible on the main page.
  4. Privacy policy is linked but located on a separate subdomain.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected.
  6. No social media links or external marketing/analytics scripts found.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS status information available from provided data.
  8. WHOIS data is limited due to DENIC policy but domain appears legitimate.
  9. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with minimal HTML and lacks modern web technologies or frameworks. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. Performance is likely moderate given the simplicity but lacks optimization for mobile and accessibility standards. SEO is poor due to missing meta tags and structured data. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts indicates minimal data collection and user tracking. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist to improve security, compliance, and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cccv.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cccv.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.