Skip to main content

Security report for casinoroom.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CasinoRoom.com is an established online platform specializing in providing reviews and information about online casinos, primarily targeting the US market. The website offers detailed content on gambling sites, bonuses, and industry trends, positioning itself as a niche content provider in the online gambling sector. The business model appears to be content publishing with affiliate marketing elements, focusing on adult users interested in online gambling. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, leveraging modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer for analytics and optimization. The domain is well-established, created in 2004, and uses reputable services like GoDaddy and Cloudflare for domain registration and DNS management. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and has domain status protections but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages detected. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate technical maturity and business credibility but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching casinoroom.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CasinoRoom.com operates in the online gambling content niche, focusing on US-based online casino reviews. Its competitive advantage lies in its longevity and specialized content targeting a regulated and lucrative market segment. The business likely generates revenue through affiliate partnerships with online casinos, offering bonuses and promotions to users. The target audience is adult gamblers in the US, and the site provides relevant industry insights and gambling addiction awareness content. The platform uses modern marketing and analytics tools, indicating an active approach to user engagement and conversion optimization. However, the absence of clear contact and compliance information may limit trust among more cautious users. There is no indication of parent or subsidiary companies, suggesting an independent operation.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic security posture with mandatory HTTPS enabled and domain status protections that prevent unauthorized domain changes. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces its defense-in-depth capabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are publicly available, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. The use of third-party analytics and optimization tools introduces potential privacy and security risks if not properly managed. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing security policies, and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Add clear contact information including business email and phone to improve transparency and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides online casino reviews focused on the US market, covering the online gambling and casino industry growth and related topics.
Key services
Online casino reviews, Gambling industry information, Bonus and offer listings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Cloudflare DNS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited etc.

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a content-driven online casino review platform targeting US users.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  4. No direct contact information (email, phone, address) found in the content.
  5. Uses modern tracking and optimization tools like Google Tag Manager and VWO.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. Domain is old and registered with a reputable registrar without privacy protection.
  9. Content is adult-oriented due to gambling focus but no explicit adult content warnings found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, a widely used CMS, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Visual Website Optimizer for analytics and A/B testing. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and uses Cloudflare for DNS, indicating a reliable hosting and DNS infrastructure. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some preloading of images and asynchronous script loading. However, the lack of visible security headers and DNSSEC indicates some technical debt in security hardening. Accessibility features are basic, and there is room for improvement in compliance and user experience enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with casinoroom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review casinoroom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.