Skip to main content

Security report for cartstack.com

CartStack LLC · E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CartStack LLC operates a SaaS platform specializing in recovering abandoned shopping carts for e-commerce businesses through multichannel remarketing campaigns including email, SMS, push notifications, and on-site retention tools. The company targets online retailers seeking to increase conversion rates and recover lost revenue. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive service descriptions and customer testimonials, positioning CartStack as a credible player in the e-commerce marketing technology sector. Technically, the site employs a modern technology stack with multiple analytics and marketing integrations, hosted on AWS Cloudfront CDN, and optimized for mobile devices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though some security headers are missing and no explicit cookie consent mechanism is present. WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain transparency, but the website's professionalism and functionality mitigate immediate trust issues. Overall, CartStack demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cartstack.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CartStack's market positioning leverages its SaaS model to serve e-commerce businesses with cart abandonment recovery solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in multichannel messaging and easy integration with major e-commerce platforms. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for usage tiers. The target customers are online retailers and booking platforms. The company shows growth indicators through extensive marketing and integration partnerships. The ecosystem includes affiliate marketing via LeadDyno and retargeting through AdRoll and Perfect Audience. Strategic observations highlight the importance of expanding privacy compliance and enhancing direct contact transparency to strengthen customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS and secure form validation. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated via privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are lacking. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced transparency and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details to reduce suspicion and increase legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CartStack LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CartStack LLC
Description
CartStack helps e-commerce sites recover abandoned shopping carts with an easy, inexpensive email reminder solution that integrates with any website.
Key services
Abandoned cart email reminders, Push notifications, SMS reminders, On-site retention tools, Conversion optimization, Integrations with ecommerce and booking platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap Grid, Glide.js, Magnific Popup, Heap Analytics, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, AdRoll, LeadDyno, Visual Website Optimizer, Zapier integration, LazyLoad
Platforms
Ecommerce platforms (integrations mentioned)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Heap Analytics, Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Pipedrive LeadBooster
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll, Perfect Audience
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Heap Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, LeadDyno, Visual Website Optimizer, Pipedrive LeadBooster
Marketing tools
SumoMe, Zapier
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple interactive features.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a commercial site.
  4. Strong presence of marketing and analytics tools indicating mature digital marketing.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the site; contact is via forms.
  6. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and accessible.
  7. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  8. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  9. Multiple customer testimonials and trust badges present.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and diverse technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap Grid, Glide.js for carousels, Magnific Popup for modals, and multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Heap Analytics, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Visual Website Optimizer. Hosting is via AWS Cloudfront CDN, supporting good performance and scalability. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and lazy loading for images. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Some technical debt is indicated by multiple external scripts which may impact load times. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cartstack.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cartstack.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.