Skip to main content

Security report for caremalta.com

Other · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.caremalta.com is currently inaccessible beyond a security challenge page implementing a proof-of-work captcha mechanism. This indicates the presence of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or similar security control blocking direct access to the site's content. Due to this, no meaningful business or contact information is available, and the domain WHOIS data is missing or unregistered, raising concerns about the legitimacy or operational status of the domain. The technical infrastructure includes use of Cloudfront CDN and client-side cryptographic scripts for the challenge, but no further technology or CMS details are discernible. Security posture is limited to the challenge mechanism itself, with no visible HTTPS or security headers. Overall, the site lacks transparency, business credibility, and privacy compliance indicators, resulting in a low trust and security score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching caremalta.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate caremalta.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
7
Registered
7
Resolving
7
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-07-15

Masked preview

  • ca••••••••.comMediumhyphenation
  • ci•••••••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • ca•••••••.comLowreplacement

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of caremalta.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence data can be extracted due to the lack of accessible content and absence of WHOIS registration data. The domain appears unregistered or the WHOIS data is unavailable, which is inconsistent with the presence of a website. No contact details, privacy policies, or business descriptions are present, preventing any assessment of market positioning, business model, or partnerships.

Security posture

The security posture is primarily characterized by the presence of a proof-of-work captcha challenge, likely implemented by a WAF or security service to mitigate automated access or attacks. However, no HTTPS or security headers are visible, and no privacy or incident response policies are published. The lack of WHOIS data and domain registration information further reduces trust. The site is effectively inaccessible to normal users, which may protect it from some attacks but also limits legitimate access and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and ensure proper HTTPS with valid SSL/TLS certificates to secure communications.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with legal requirements and build trust.
  3. Provide accessible contact information and business details to improve credibility.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Review WAF and captcha settings to balance security with user accessibility and avoid blocking legitimate visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page is a robot challenge screen with proof-of-work captcha, indicating WAF or security challenge blocking access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
Checking the site connection security
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Web Crypto API, SHA1, Base64 encoding
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
25/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of cryptographic challenge (proof of work captcha)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a security challenge (proof-of-work captcha).
  2. No meaningful website content is accessible for analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or business details available.
  5. No WHOIS data available, domain appears unregistered or WHOIS is restricted.
  6. Use of Cloudfront CDN for hosting challenge assets.
  7. No SEO or accessibility features detected.
  8. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  9. No social media or external business links found.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses client-side JavaScript with cryptographic functions to implement a proof-of-work captcha challenge, served via Cloudfront CDN. No CMS or backend technology is detectable. The HTML is minimal and lacks SEO metadata or accessibility features. Performance is moderate due to CDN usage, but user experience is poor because of the blocking challenge. No analytics or advertising scripts are present, indicating minimal tracking or marketing infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with caremalta.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review caremalta.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.