Skip to main content

Security report for carat.lt

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at https://www.carat.com/baltics/en currently serves a 404 error page indicating that the requested content is not found or the page is not available. There is no accessible business content, metadata, or contact information to analyze. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, suggesting the domain may not be registered or WHOIS information is withheld. The site uses modern web technologies such as React and Next.js but only delivers an error page, indicating either a misconfiguration or inactive site. From a technical perspective, the site uses a modern JavaScript framework but lacks SEO optimization, accessibility features, and performance indicators due to the absence of real content. Security posture cannot be assessed fully as no security headers or SSL/TLS details are provided. Privacy compliance is non-existent with no privacy or cookie policies detected. Overall, the security posture is weak due to lack of accessible content and transparency. The absence of WHOIS data and the 404 error page raise significant legitimacy concerns. The site is currently not suitable for business or user engagement and requires immediate remediation to restore content and proper domain registration. Strategic recommendations include verifying domain registration status, deploying valid content with privacy and security policies, implementing HTTPS and security headers, and providing clear contact and business information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching carat.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention carat.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for carat.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and metadata, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears inactive or misconfigured. No information about market positioning, business model, or partnerships is available. The absence of contact details and policies further limits any business insights. The domain's lack of WHOIS data suggests it may not be currently in use or is protected by privacy services without public data.

Security posture

The security posture is currently very weak. No HTTPS or SSL/TLS information is available, and no security headers are detected. The site serves only a 404 error page with no forms or inputs, so attack surface is minimal but also indicates poor site maintenance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the site is not secure or trustworthy in its current state.

Recommendations

  1. Verify domain registration status and update WHOIS records to ensure transparency.
  2. Deploy valid website content to replace the 404 error page and provide business information.
  3. Implement HTTPS with valid SSL/TLS certificates and configure security headers.
  4. Add privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service pages to comply with regulations.
  5. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website URL leads to a 404 error page with no accessible content.
  2. No metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found.
  3. No forms, contact information, or social media links present.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  5. No security headers or SSL/TLS information available from provided data.
  6. Site uses React and Next.js frameworks but serves only an error page.
  7. No external links or advertising/tracking technologies detected.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating possible domain non-existence or privacy blocking.
  9. Overall website quality and trust indicators are very poor due to lack of content and accessibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React and Next.js frameworks, indicating a modern JavaScript-based infrastructure. However, the site currently only serves a 404 error page with minimal HTML content and no metadata or structured data. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. Performance and accessibility cannot be fully assessed due to lack of content. The site lacks SEO optimization and does not include any analytics or tracking scripts. Technical debt appears high as the site is non-functional for end users.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with carat.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review carat.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.