Skip to main content

Security report for caramel.cz

Caramel · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Caramel.cz is a small Czech advertising and graphic design firm specializing in comprehensive advertising services including graphic design, logo creation, corporate visual identity, and web presentations. The company offers end-to-end production and printing services ranging from business cards to vehicle wraps. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting businesses seeking creative advertising solutions. Technically, the site uses older JavaScript libraries such as MooTools and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with no visible HTTPS confirmation or security headers in the provided data, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating gaps in compliance. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security, privacy compliance, and updated technical infrastructure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching caramel.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Caramel operates in the advertising and graphic design sector, focusing on small business clients in the Czech Republic. Their competitive advantage lies in offering creative, original graphic solutions and a full range of printing services. The business model is service-oriented with revenue likely generated from design projects and print production. The company maintains a portfolio of recent projects showcased on the site, indicating active client engagement. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies may impact trust with potential clients. Growth indicators are not explicit but the site content suggests a stable small business presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with no visible HTTPS confirmation or security headers in the provided data. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, which is positive. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The use of older JavaScript libraries may pose potential security risks if not maintained. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures to enhance protection and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify configuration.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Upgrade JavaScript libraries and improve mobile optimization and accessibility for better user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Caramel
Description
Firma nabízející kompletní reklamní služby, specializující se na tvorbu logotypů, vizuálního stylu firem a webových prezentací. Nabízí kompletní výrobu a tisk od vizitek po polep automobilů.
Key services
grafické návrhy, tvorba logotypů, vizuální styl firem, webové prezentace, výroba a tisk reklamních materiálů
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, MooTools 1.2.2, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Website uses older JavaScript libraries (MooTools 1.2.2) and Google Analytics for tracking.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS status visible from provided data; SSL status unknown.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is a significant transparency and trust issue.
  7. Content is business-focused, safe, and professional with no adult or questionable content.
  8. Site navigation and design are good but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. No social media links found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries (MooTools 1.2.2) and Google Analytics for tracking. The HTML structure is valid and includes basic SEO meta tags but lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications. Performance is moderate with some client-side scripting for UI interactions. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected. The site would benefit from modernization of its tech stack, improved performance optimization, and enhanced accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and improve user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with caramel.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review caramel.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.