Skip to main content

Security report for caparol.cz

Caparol · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Caparol.cz is a professionally designed website representing a large manufacturing company specializing in paints, coatings, and building materials in the Czech Republic. The site targets a broad audience including construction professionals, architects, wholesalers, and private customers. The business model is primarily B2B and B2C with a strong market presence in the coatings industry. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS and integrates modern technologies such as Piwik PRO analytics and Cookiebot for consent management, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms, though some improvements are recommended such as adding security headers and publishing security policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits full trust assessment but the website content and technology usage indicate a legitimate and professional business. Overall, the site demonstrates good compliance with GDPR and privacy standards, with extensive use of analytics and advertising networks managed transparently through consent.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching caparol.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention caparol.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
100%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for caparol.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on paints and coatings with a well-established brand in the Czech market. The website supports multiple customer segments including professionals and private clients, indicating a diversified business model. The use of advanced analytics and marketing tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and advertising. The lack of visible direct contact information on the site may indicate reliance on partner or regional offices for customer interaction. The company leverages partnerships with major advertising and analytics providers such as Adform, Meta Platforms, and Piwik PRO, enhancing its marketing reach and effectiveness.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs a robust cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, which is a strong indicator of privacy awareness. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which are important for transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found, and the use of reputable third-party services for analytics and advertising is managed with user consent. The security score is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Make company contact information more visible and accessible on the website to improve business credibility and customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Caparol
Description
Caparol is a company focused on manufacturing and supplying paints, coatings, and related building materials.
Key services
Paints and coatings, Building materials, Technical support and consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery, Flickity, Piwik PRO Analytics, Cookiebot Consent Management
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of reputable third-party analytics with privacy controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO, Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Piwik PRO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern CMS TYPO3 with professional design
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot
  3. Extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising networks with consent
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage HTML
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or registry restrictions
  6. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No visible privacy or security policy pages on main domain but linked to Cookiebot privacy policy
  8. No signs of malware, phishing, or adult content
  9. Good GDPR compliance indicators
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses TYPO3 CMS, a mature and flexible content management system suitable for enterprise-level sites. It integrates several JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Flickity for UI components and sliders. Analytics are handled by Piwik PRO and Google Analytics, with user consent managed by Cookiebot, indicating a modern approach to data privacy. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and improved accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with caparol.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review caparol.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.