Skip to main content

Security report for candyxland.top

Other · United States

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Candy X Land is an adult content affiliate website primarily focused on providing links to adult video downloads and nudist-themed content. The site operates as an affiliate marketing portal, generating revenue through external referrals and advertising. The business model targets adult users interested in explicit content, with no visible age verification or privacy safeguards. Technically, the site uses basic web technologies including jQuery, Nivo Slider, and Google Analytics for tracking. However, it lacks modern security practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers, and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which raises compliance concerns. The overall security posture is weak, with multiple external links to suspicious domains and no incident response or contact information provided. The site’s design and content quality are basic and unprofessional, limiting user trust and experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching candyxland.top

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention candyxland.top, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for candyxland.top right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the adult affiliate marketing sector, linking to various external adult content providers. Its competitive advantage is minimal, relying on volume of external links rather than unique content or services. The business model is low-cost and low-transparency, typical for adult affiliate sites. There is no evidence of a formal company structure or professional branding. The target audience is adults seeking free or downloadable adult videos. Growth indicators and partnerships appear limited to other adult affiliate domains. The lack of privacy and security policies, combined with privacy-protected WHOIS registration, suggests a focus on anonymity rather than long-term brand building.

Security posture

The security maturity of the site is low. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers exposes users to potential interception and attacks. External scripts and affiliate links come from multiple unverified domains, increasing risk of malware or phishing. No privacy or cookie policies are present, violating GDPR and other privacy regulations. There is no incident response or security contact information, indicating poor readiness for security events. The site does not implement secure forms or input validation, though no forms are present. Overall, the site poses privacy and security risks to users and lacks compliance with standard data protection practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Audit and remove suspicious or potentially malicious external links and scripts.
  5. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  6. Improve website design and user experience to enhance trustworthiness.
  7. Consider age verification mechanisms for adult content compliance.
  8. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics for security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to be a content portal linking to various external video download sites and adult-themed affiliate links.
Key services
Providing links to adult video downloads, Affiliate referrals to adult content websites
Content quality
basic
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Nivo Slider, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
wpadmngr.com, tubecorp.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content affiliate portal with multiple external links to adult video downloads and nudist content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business transparency.
  4. Use of multiple external ad and affiliate networks.
  5. No security best practices observed such as HTTPS enforcement or security headers.
  6. Content and design quality are basic and unprofessional.
  7. Potentially suspicious external domains linked.
  8. No forms or data collection fields detected except for affiliate link redirections.
  9. Google Analytics is used for tracking without privacy disclosures.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Nivo Slider for UI effects, and Google Analytics for user tracking. The hosting and DNS are managed by NameSilo and Namecheap respectively, with no DNSSEC enabled. The HTML structure is basic with minimal SEO optimization and no accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern frameworks and responsive design. There is no CMS detected, indicating a static or custom-built site. The site lacks modern security configurations and does not implement privacy or compliance standards. Technical debt is evident in commented-out legacy code and unused template content. Modernization opportunities include adopting HTTPS, improving SEO, and enhancing mobile responsiveness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with candyxland.top. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review candyxland.top.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.