Skip to main content

Security report for candydoll.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'candydoll.cz' operates as an adult-oriented amateur forum primarily focused on sharing videos and pictures of young girls, including VIP content collections. It targets an adults-only audience and functions as a community platform using MyBB forum software. The site has a niche market position within adult amateur content forums but lacks transparency and formal business information. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as jQuery, FontAwesome, and Google Fonts, with hosting DNS managed via Cloudflare. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and performance but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing critical security headers and no visible incident response or security policies. The WHOIS data is suspicious due to a future domain creation date and lack of registrant details, which undermines trust. Overall, the site has poor privacy compliance and business credibility, with no privacy or cookie policies and no verified contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching candydoll.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention candydoll.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
100%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for candydoll.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates as a small-scale adult content forum with a business model based on user-generated content and VIP access to exclusive collections. It maintains partnerships with numerous similar adult sites, as evidenced by extensive external linking and banner advertising. The target audience is adults interested in amateur and explicit content. The lack of formal business information and suspicious WHOIS data suggest limited legitimacy and potential risk. The site appears to rely on advertising and community engagement for revenue, with no clear monetization beyond VIP content access. Growth indicators are unclear, and the partnership ecosystem is primarily adult content related. Strategic observations include the need for improved transparency, compliance, and security to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low to moderate. HTTPS is implemented, which is a positive baseline. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security exposes the site to common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or abuse contact information is provided, limiting the ability to handle security incidents effectively. The site uses standard third-party libraries like jQuery but does not indicate any vulnerability management. Privacy compliance is poor, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, increasing regulatory risk. The presence of adult content without age verification mechanisms further complicates compliance. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvement to protect users and the business.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Introduce age verification mechanisms to restrict access to adult content appropriately.
  4. Publish clear incident response and abuse contact information to improve security readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
An online forum focused on sharing amateur videos and pictures of young girls, with sections for VIP collections and various amateur content.
Key services
Forum discussions, Sharing amateur videos and pictures, VIP content access
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
MyBB, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure login form with CSRF token

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
faplist.top, jbteen.cc, bpixs.fr, alljbtop.com
Tracking pixels
blozoo.info
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult-oriented amateur forum with explicit content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Uses MyBB forum software with jQuery and FontAwesome.
  4. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  5. Multiple external links to adult and suspicious domains.
  6. No clear business or legal entity information provided.
  7. Contains advertising banners and partner links to similar adult sites.
  8. No social media official links found.
  9. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  10. Domain WHOIS data is suspicious with future creation date.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the MyBB forum platform, utilizing jQuery and FontAwesome for UI components, and Google Fonts for typography. Hosting DNS is managed via Cloudflare, but no advanced CDN or performance optimization is evident. The site is moderately mobile responsive but lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic, with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site uses standard HTML and CSS but does not implement modern frontend frameworks or progressive web app features. Performance is moderate, with some external scripts and banners that may impact load times. Technical debt is present in the form of missing security headers and lack of privacy compliance mechanisms. Modernization opportunities include enhancing SEO, accessibility, and security configurations to improve user experience and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with candydoll.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review candydoll.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.