Skip to main content

Security report for canaldedenuncias.com.br

Aliant · Other · Brazil

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aliant is a well-established Brazilian company specializing in ethical reporting channels and compliance solutions, serving over 1000 organizations with a strong market presence for more than 25 years. Their website reflects a mature digital infrastructure built on WordPress, integrating modern analytics and marketing technologies such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, providing a professional user experience with clear navigation and comprehensive content. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, Google reCAPTCHA, and Cloudflare DNS, although additional security headers and a formal security policy could enhance their posture. Contact information and trust signals such as certifications and client testimonials are prominently displayed, supporting business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching canaldedenuncias.com.br

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aliant operates primarily in the B2B sector, targeting companies requiring whistleblowing and compliance channels, including solutions for denunciations, emergencies, and LGPD compliance. Their business model focuses on customized service delivery with a strong emphasis on ethical culture and risk prevention. The company leverages partnerships and certifications like Pró-Ética to reinforce trust. Their client base includes major Brazilian and international companies, indicating a robust market position. The parent company ICTS Participações is acknowledged, suggesting a broader corporate structure. Marketing and analytics tools are extensively used to support lead generation and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS, Cloudflare DNS, and Google reCAPTCHA integration to prevent automated abuse. However, the absence of several recommended HTTP security headers (e.g., HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and a publicly available security policy or incident response page indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider creating and publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aliant
Description
Aliant provides whistleblowing and reporting channels solutions, including channels for denunciations, welcoming, emergencies, ombudsman, and LGPD compliance. They have over 25 years of experience serving more than 1000 organizations and 5 million people, focusing on ethical culture and risk prevention.
Key services
Whistleblowing channels, Reporting and incident management, Ethics and compliance consulting, Dashboards and reporting, 24/7 availability
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.1.1, jQuery 3.5.1, Slick Carousel, Google reCAPTCHA v3, HubSpot analytics and forms, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Dreamdata analytics, Clearbit scripts, Hotjar
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and CDN

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Dreamdata
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Dreamdata
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Clearbit
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Brazilian Portuguese.
  3. Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and whistleblowing services.
  4. Multiple trust signals including client logos, certifications, and testimonials.
  5. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with privacy considerations.
  6. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  8. No evidence of security policy or incident response page publicly available.
  9. No terms of service page explicitly found.
  10. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.1.1 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, and multiple analytics and marketing integrations (HubSpot, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Dreamdata). Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve page speed. Some technical debt may exist due to multiple third-party scripts, but overall the infrastructure is stable and well-maintained. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with canaldedenuncias.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review canaldedenuncias.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.