Skip to main content

Security report for canaldecomunicacion.info

Visual Web Studio, S.L. · Other · Spain

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website canaldecomunicacion.info is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) block triggered by a GEO_IP_BLOCK rule. The domain is registered to Visual Web Studio, S.L., a Spanish company established in early 2024, indicating a new business or project. Due to the block, no actual website content, metadata, or contact information is available for analysis. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare protection and hosting by Tecnocrática Centro de Datos, S.L., but DNSSEC is not enabled. The security posture cannot be fully assessed given the lack of accessible content and headers. Overall, the site shows legitimate domain registration but lacks visible business or compliance information on the public-facing page.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching canaldecomunicacion.info

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind the domain appears to be Visual Web Studio, S.L., a small Spanish company founded in 2024. No detailed business description, services, or market positioning is available due to the blocked content. The domain age aligns with a new venture. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of visible contact or policy information limits insights into customer engagement or compliance maturity.

Security posture

The site is protected by Cloudflare WAF, which is actively blocking access based on geographic IP restrictions. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available from the provided data. The absence of DNSSEC and published security policies suggests room for improvement in security best practices. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not visible. Overall security maturity appears low due to lack of transparency and blocked access.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and trust.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels on the website.
  4. Review and adjust WAF rules to avoid blocking legitimate users and improve accessibility.
  5. Implement security headers and ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. The website is blocked by a Cloudflare security service with a GEO_IP_BLOCK. The page shows a block message indicating the user is unable to access the site due to security rules. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Visual Web Studio, S.L.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare WAF with GEO_IP_BLOCK.
  2. No visible website content beyond the block page.
  3. No metadata, forms, external links, or contact information found in the HTML.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies detected.
  5. No scripts or analytics libraries detected in the HTML content.
  6. Domain registration is recent but legitimate with clear registrant data.
  7. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  8. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  9. Website is inaccessible for content analysis due to WAF blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare as a security and CDN provider, hosted by Tecnocrática Centro de Datos, S.L. The domain is newly registered with no DNSSEC enabled. The HTML content is minimal and only displays a block message, indicating a WAF block. No CMS, analytics, or marketing technologies are detected. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The technical stack is basic with potential for modernization once the site is accessible.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with canaldecomunicacion.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review canaldecomunicacion.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.