Skip to main content

Security report for canaldaetica.com.br

Contato Seguro · Other · Brazil

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Contato Seguro operates a specialized whistleblowing channel platform designed to help companies in Brazil comply with legal requirements such as Lei 14.457/22 and Lei 14.611/22. The company targets businesses with CIPA and those seeking to enhance their compliance and ethical reporting capabilities. With over 3,000 clients and a strong market presence, Contato Seguro offers AI generative technology, real-time report management, and comprehensive support services. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrations, although performance could be improved due to high resource count and page size. Security posture is solid with valid SSL and reCAPTCHA integration, but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DMARC implementation. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented with consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its business goals.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of canaldaetica.com.br. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching canaldaetica.com.br

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
50
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a market leader in the Brazilian compliance and whistleblowing sector, leveraging technology and legal expertise to serve medium-sized enterprises. Its business model focuses on providing outsourced, secure, and legally compliant reporting channels, supported by AI and expert teams. The presence of extensive client testimonials, media coverage, and a high volume of positive reviews indicates strong customer trust and brand recognition. The company maintains active social media channels and partnerships, enhancing its ecosystem and market reach. The focus on legal compliance and data protection aligns with growing regulatory demands in Brazil, positioning Contato Seguro for continued growth.

Security posture

Contato Seguro demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and valid SSL certificates. The use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms enhances protection against automated abuse. However, the absence of HSTS, DMARC, and other security headers like CSP and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The company appears to prioritize confidentiality and data protection, critical for whistleblowing services. Incident response and security policy documentation were not found, suggesting potential gaps in formal security governance. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS.
  2. Publish and configure DMARC DNS records to prevent email spoofing and improve email security.
  3. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance incident response and security policy documentation accessible to clients and stakeholders.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and several premium addons, indicating a modern and flexible CMS environment. It leverages Cloudflare for DNS and hosting, providing some level of infrastructure security and performance optimization. The site uses Google Tag Manager and ActiveCampaign for marketing and analytics, along with Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security. Despite the modern stack, the site suffers from slow load times and a large number of resources, which could impact user experience. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with responsive design and proper semantic markup. SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin and comprehensive meta tags. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential performance bottlenecks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 66/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with canaldaetica.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review canaldaetica.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.