Skip to main content

Security report for campusvirtualsp.org

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at campusvirtualsp.org is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page with no visible content. This prevents any direct analysis of the site's business offerings, user interface, or security posture from the website itself. The domain is registered since 2003 with Gandi SAS and uses Amazon AWS DNS servers, indicating a potentially established entity. However, the lack of accessible content and absence of metadata, policies, or contact information severely limits the ability to assess the business or technical maturity. From a technical perspective, the site appears to be either restricted by server configuration or protected by access controls, but no explicit WAF vendor is identified. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests room for improvement in domain and site security. No SSL configuration details were provided, but the domain status includes clientTransferProhibited, which is a positive sign against unauthorized domain transfers. Security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to lack of content and headers. No privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating non-compliance with GDPR or similar regulations if the site is intended for EU users. No contact or incident response information is available, which is a risk factor for trust and compliance. Overall, the site is currently non-functional or access-restricted, resulting in a low AI score and inability to provide meaningful business or security insights. Strategic recommendations focus on restoring accessible content, implementing security best practices, and publishing compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching campusvirtualsp.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible website content, no direct business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests a long-standing presence, but no information on market positioning, business model, or services is available. The use of AWS DNS servers indicates modern hosting infrastructure. Without contact or policy information, the business credibility and operational transparency cannot be assessed. No partnerships or related domains are identified.

Security posture

The security posture is indeterminate due to lack of accessible content and headers. The domain is registered with clientTransferProhibited status, which is positive. DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a minor security gap. No security headers or SSL details are available. The 403 Forbidden response may indicate intentional access restriction or misconfiguration. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. Overall, the site lacks visible security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Restore website accessibility to allow content and services to be evaluated and used by visitors.
  2. Implement and enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.
  3. Publish privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service pages to comply with legal requirements and build trust.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  5. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website returns a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content indicating access is blocked or restricted. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.
  2. No metadata, scripts, forms, or external links found in HTML content.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No contact information or social media links available.
  5. Domain is registered since 2003 with Gandi SAS and uses AWS DNS servers.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  7. Content safety is rated safe due to lack of content.
  8. Analysis limited due to blocked content; most fields marked unknown or false.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves a minimal HTML page with a 403 Forbidden status, indicating blocked access. No metadata, scripts, or forms are present. DNS is managed via Amazon AWS DNS servers, suggesting cloud hosting infrastructure. The domain is registered with Gandi SAS since 2003 and has clientTransferProhibited status. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with campusvirtualsp.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review campusvirtualsp.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.