Skip to main content

Security report for campuscyber.fr

Campus Cyber · Government · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Campus Cyber is a French national cybersecurity hub initiated by the government to unite key actors in cybersecurity including enterprises, government services, research, and training organizations. It serves as a collaborative ecosystem fostering innovation, training, and operational synergies to strengthen France's digital sovereignty. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and uses modern technologies such as WordPress, Vue.js components, and integrates analytics tools like Matomo and Google Analytics. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, Content-Security-Policy headers, and bot protection via reCAPTCHA, although explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly detailed. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant with user consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-maintained, and serves as a credible digital presence for the Campus Cyber initiative.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching campuscyber.fr

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention campuscyber.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for campuscyber.fr.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Campus Cyber occupies a strategic position as a government-backed cybersecurity ecosystem hub in France, targeting a broad audience of cybersecurity professionals, companies, and public sector entities. Its business model revolves around fostering collaboration, innovation, and training within the cybersecurity domain. The presence of over 250 engaged actors and partnerships with entities like Cybiah.eu indicate a growing and active ecosystem. The website supports this with clear content, multilingual support, and event and recruitment information. The digital maturity is moderate to high, leveraging modern CMS and analytics, with room for enhanced security transparency. The partnership with digital agency VingtCinq.io reflects professional branding and digital strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced, a strict Content-Security-Policy header, and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent is implemented in compliance with GDPR. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms such as security.txt limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Recommendations include adding explicit security and incident response information, implementing security.txt, and enhancing security headers for defense in depth.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Add additional security headers such as HSTS and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and analytics tools for security and privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Campus Cyber
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Campus Cyber
Description
Le Campus Cyber est le lieu totem de la cybersécurité qui rassemble les principaux acteurs nationaux et internationaux du domaine. Il vise à renforcer la souveraineté numérique et protéger l’écosystème national en France.
Key services
Hosting cybersecurity actors and organizations, Facilitating partnerships and synergies, Training and talent development, Research and innovation support, Event hosting and ecosystem mobilization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO plugin, Matomo analytics, Mapbox GL JS, Google reCAPTCHA, WPML multilingual plugin, Vue.js (VueCarousel component)
Frameworks
WordPress, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on cybersecurity ecosystem in France with government and private sector collaboration.
  3. Good implementation of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No visible security or privacy red flags.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage or footer; contact is via contact page link.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter (X), and YouTube.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with Yoast SEO for search optimization and WPML for multilingual support. It uses Vue.js components for interactive elements like carousels and integrates Mapbox for mapping features. Analytics are handled by Matomo and Google Analytics, with Google Tag Manager for marketing. Hosting is via GANDI, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses a strict Content-Security-Policy header to limit resource loading and reduce attack surface. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries, but accessibility could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 64/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with campuscyber.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review campuscyber.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.