Skip to main content

Security report for campus-cowork.com

Campus · Other · Slovakia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Campus is a small business focused on providing tailored corporate innovation services such as hackathons, ideathons, and B2B partnerships primarily targeting businesses seeking innovation solutions. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and integrates common analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager. The technical infrastructure is modern and mobile-optimized, offering a good user experience and professional design. However, the security posture is moderate due to the absence of visible security headers and lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies. The domain WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and presents a professional business front but requires improvements in security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching campus-cowork.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
58
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Campus operates in a niche market providing corporate innovation events and partnerships. Its business model revolves around organizing customized hackathons and ideathons for companies, facilitating innovation and collaboration. The target audience includes corporate clients interested in innovation-driven growth. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and good content quality but lacks visible trust indicators such as certifications or client testimonials. The absence of clear contact information and domain registration details may impact credibility. The use of multiple tracking and marketing tools suggests an active digital marketing strategy. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and common third-party analytics scripts but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. No explicit privacy, cookie, or incident response policies are present, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR. The WHOIS data absence is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site would benefit from enhanced security configurations, clear privacy documentation, and incident response contact channels to improve its security maturity and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to enhance trustworthiness.
  4. Provide clear contact information including business emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and ensure secure form handling to prevent data leaks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Campus
Description
Firemné inovácie - hackathon na mieru, ideathon na mieru, B2B partnerstvo
Key services
hackathon na mieru, ideathon na mieru, B2B partnerstvo
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is unusual for an active business site
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content
  5. Site uses multiple third-party tracking and analytics scripts
  6. Content is business-oriented and safe for general audiences
  7. Technical implementation uses modern CMS and page builder but lacks visible security headers
  8. No visible security or incident response policies
  9. No certifications or trust badges displayed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder, leveraging modern web fonts and multiple analytics/tracking services. The site is mobile-optimized and uses asynchronous loading for scripts to improve performance. However, no hosting provider or CDN information was found. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is standard for small business websites but requires improvements in security and compliance-related technical implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with campus-cowork.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review campus-cowork.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.