Skip to main content

Security report for campaigncanada.ca

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.campaigncanada.ca appears to be a media or campaign-related platform primarily utilizing video player technologies such as VideoJS and Brightcove Player. The site integrates multiple third-party analytics and tracking services including New Relic, Google Tag Manager, and Crazy Egg, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity in terms of performance monitoring and user behavior tracking. However, the website lacks visible business information, contact details, and formal policies such as privacy or cookie statements, which limits its transparency and trustworthiness. The absence of WHOIS registration data further complicates the assessment of the domain's legitimacy and ownership. From a technical perspective, the site employs modern video playback technologies and standard analytics tools but shows only basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no evident blocking or WAF challenges detected. Security posture is weak due to missing security headers and lack of published security policies. No SSL/TLS configuration details were available, but HTTPS is presumed given the URL scheme. Overall, the security posture is minimal with no explicit vulnerabilities detected in the provided data, but the lack of security best practices and transparency poses risks. The domain's registration status is unclear, which is a significant concern for business credibility. Strategic recommendations include establishing clear privacy and cookie policies, publishing contact and incident response information, improving security headers, and verifying domain registration details to enhance trust. This assessment suggests that while the website functions technically for media delivery, it requires substantial improvements in governance, transparency, and security to meet professional and compliance standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching campaigncanada.ca

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets audiences interested in campaigns, likely political or social, leveraging video content as a primary engagement tool. The business model appears to be content dissemination or advocacy, though explicit monetization or service offerings are not evident. The lack of company information and contact details limits insights into market positioning or competitive advantages. The presence of advanced analytics tools suggests an intent to monitor user engagement closely, possibly for campaign effectiveness. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data. Growth indicators and revenue streams cannot be determined due to missing business disclosures.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. The site lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are essential to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated, with no security contact channels found. The use of reputable analytics services is a positive, but without transparency and security best practices, the risk of data exposure or regulatory non-compliance is elevated. No explicit vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found, but the absence of security controls is a concern.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify certificate validity.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
VideoJS, Brightcove Player, Google Tag Manager, New Relic, Crazy Egg
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Crazy Egg
Tracking pixels
New Relic
Marketing tools
Crazy Egg
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable, domain registration status unclear.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  4. Website uses multiple third-party analytics and tracking services.
  5. Content is minimal and mostly technical player scripts; no clear business information.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms; site content is accessible.
  8. Website appears to be a media or campaign-related site using video players.
  9. No explicit adult or NSFW content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern video playback technologies (VideoJS, Brightcove Player) and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools (New Relic, Google Tag Manager, Crazy Egg). The technical infrastructure supports media delivery but shows only basic mobile optimization and accessibility. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate with no blocking or WAF interference. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features, and no security headers were detected. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details is a technical risk factor affecting trust and legitimacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with campaigncanada.ca. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review campaigncanada.ca.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.