Skip to main content

Security report for camif.fr

Camif · E-commerce · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Camif is a French e-commerce company specializing in sustainable and locally manufactured furniture and home decor. The website presents a professional and well-branded platform targeting consumers interested in eco-responsible products. The company emphasizes French and European manufacturing, supported by certifications such as B Corp and Entreprise à mission. The site features a rich product catalog, promotional offers, and strong social media presence. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, analytics, and marketing tools, but lacks a valid SSL certificate and proper HTTPS configuration, which is a critical security concern. Security headers are well implemented, but the absence of TLS protocols and session resumption reduces the security posture significantly. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are present and comprehensive, supporting GDPR compliance. Contact information is available primarily via phone and contact forms, with no explicit emails found in the content. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and maintain compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching camif.fr

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Camif operates in the niche market of sustainable home furnishings in France, leveraging local manufacturing and eco-responsibility as key differentiators. Its business model is e-commerce retail with a focus on transparency and quality. The company benefits from strong trust indicators including certifications and customer reviews. Partnerships with payment providers and marketing platforms enhance its operational capabilities. The target audience is environmentally conscious consumers seeking quality furniture made in France or Europe. The company is medium-sized with a solid digital presence and a clear mission aligned with sustainability trends.

Security posture

The website demonstrates moderate security maturity with well-configured security headers and content security policies. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS/TLS protocols represent critical vulnerabilities that expose users to data interception and undermine trust. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating potential gaps in security governance. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools increases the attack surface and requires careful data protection management. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of security transparency are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and strong cipher suites to secure communications.
  3. Activate HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to enforce HTTPS usage.
  4. Implement session resumption and OCSP stapling to improve SSL performance and reliability.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  6. Review and minimize third-party tracking to enhance user privacy and reduce risk.
  7. Add explicit contact emails for security and privacy inquiries.
  8. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Google Cloud infrastructure with CloudFront CDN for content delivery. It uses a modern front-end stack with JavaScript, CSS, and SVG icons. The site integrates multiple third-party services including Algolia for search, Kameleoon for A/B testing, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook SDK, Pinterest SDK, and various payment providers like PayPal and HiPay. The HTML is well structured with JSON-LD structured data for SEO. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and preloading of fonts and images. However, performance metrics are unavailable, and SSL/TLS configuration is missing, which is a major technical risk. The site uses advanced content security policies and permissions policies to restrict browser features, indicating good security awareness on the application layer.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with camif.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review camif.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.