Skip to main content

Security report for calendrierdestrails.com

calendrierdestrails.com · Other · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

calendrierdestrails.com is a specialized website launched in late 2023 that provides a comprehensive calendar and publication platform for trail running events primarily in France and abroad. It targets both trail runners looking for upcoming events and organizers wishing to publish their events quickly and for free. The site offers advanced search, regional and departmental categorization, and an interactive map to enhance user experience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern technologies including Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Google Maps API, and uses Matomo for analytics and Google AdSense for monetization. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with structured data implemented via JSON-LD. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with a clientTransferProhibited domain status but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, which are recommended for improvement. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy but could enhance security and privacy features to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching calendrierdestrails.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention calendrierdestrails.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for calendrierdestrails.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche market of trail running event aggregation and promotion, offering free event publication to organizers and a centralized calendar for runners. Its revenue model likely includes advertising and affiliate marketing partnerships with trail running equipment vendors. The site has established partnerships with related outdoor and trail-focused websites, enhancing its ecosystem. The target audience is clearly defined, and the site provides valuable services that position it well within the trail running community in France. The recent domain registration aligns with the newness of the business, indicating a startup phase with growth potential.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No incident response or security policies are publicly disclosed, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of third-party scripts and advertising networks introduces typical tracking and privacy considerations. Overall, the site is secure enough for its purpose but should adopt additional best practices to strengthen defenses and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan with contact information for security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
calendrierdestrails.com
Description
Site pour diffuser et planifier des courses de trail en France et à l'étranger, offrant un calendrier complet et la possibilité de publier des trails gratuitement.
Key services
Calendrier complet des trails, Publication gratuite d'événements, Recherche avancée de trails, Carte interactive des trails
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 5, Google Maps API, Yoast SEO, Matomo Analytics, Google AdSense, Contact Form 7, Events Manager plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Ezoic
Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is well-structured and relevant to trail running events.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form.
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking and ads.
  6. Domain is very new but consistent with the business purpose.
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content; opportunity for improvement.
  8. Advertising and affiliate links are clearly marked and relevant to the niche.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress-based infrastructure with Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and jQuery UI components. It integrates Google Maps API for interactive trail location mapping and Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets efficiently and uses Yoast SEO for metadata management. Hosting is provided by o2switch, a reputable French hosting provider. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in accessibility and security headers. The site is mobile-friendly and well-structured, supporting good SEO and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with calendrierdestrails.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review calendrierdestrails.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.