Skip to main content

Security report for cae29.coop

CHRYSALIDE · Other · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CAE 29 is a French cooperative organization under the legal entity CHRYSALIDE, founded in 2014, providing shared enterprise and employment cooperative services primarily in the Finistère region. The website serves as an informational and engagement platform for entrepreneurs and project holders seeking cooperative business support, administrative delegation, and training. The business model focuses on collective entrepreneurship and professional autonomy within a cooperative framework, positioning CAE 29 as a regional leader in this niche. Technically, the website is built on the SPIP CMS platform, hosted by Gandi SAS, and uses standard web technologies including JavaScript and CSS. The site demonstrates moderate performance and basic mobile optimization, with good SEO practices and clear navigation. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and modern security practices. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and domain transfer protection but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. There is no cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy policy, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no analytics or tracking services are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, CAE 29 presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with a solid business foundation. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC, privacy compliance, and incident response transparency would enhance its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cae29.coop

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CAE 29 operates as a cooperative business entity focused on supporting entrepreneurs and project initiators in the Finistère region of France. Its cooperative model offers administrative and accounting delegation, collective support, training, and workspace rental. The organization maintains active engagement with its community through regular news updates and social media channels. The business targets small to medium-sized entrepreneurs transitioning from micro-enterprise or individual status to entrepreneur-salaried status within a cooperative framework. Partnerships with regional and cooperative networks such as les-scop.coop and funding bodies like the French Social Fund (FSE) indicate a well-integrated ecosystem. The business model emphasizes sustainable, collective entrepreneurship with a regional focus, leveraging cooperative principles to differentiate itself in the market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and the domain is protected against unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy details may expose the organization to GDPR compliance risks. No incident response contact or security policy is published, limiting transparency and preparedness. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small cooperative but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Add a comprehensive cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities in the CMS and third-party components.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CHRYSALIDE
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CHRYSALIDE
Description
Les Coopératives d’Activités et d’Emploi® du Finistère, accompagnant porteurs de projets et entrepreneurs-salariés dans la gestion et le développement de leur activité professionnelle autonome.
Key services
Accompaniment of project development, Administrative and accounting management delegation, Collective entrepreneurial support, Training, Space rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
SPIP CMS, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in French and targeted at regional entrepreneurs in Finistère, France
  3. No privacy or cookie policy explicitly found except basic legal mentions page
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn
  7. Use of SPIP CMS and hosted on Gandi SAS infrastructure
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap
  9. No cookie consent mechanism present, potential GDPR compliance issue
  10. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, address, and contact form
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the SPIP CMS version 4.3.9, a PHP-based content management system popular in French-speaking regions. The site uses standard web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, with some custom scripts for media display (mediabox). Hosting is provided by Gandi SAS, a reputable French registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with cached CSS and JS assets, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter Card metadata. No advanced frameworks or analytics tools were detected, indicating a relatively simple technical stack with low complexity and risk. The site structure and navigation are clear and user-friendly.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cae29.coop. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cae29.coop.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.