Skip to main content

Security report for c-copy.cz

C-COPY Centrum s.r.o. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

C-COPY Centrum s.r.o. is a well-established Czech printing company with nearly three decades of experience, specializing in express digital and offset printing services. Their market position is strong within the Czech Republic, serving diverse sectors such as automotive, banking, publishing, and public services. The company offers integrated printing solutions with a focus on quality, flexibility, and personalized customer service, including B2B and B2C segments with a dedicated photography brand. Technically, the website employs a custom CMS with legacy JavaScript libraries and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate but could be improved by enforcing HTTPS on all resources, adding security headers, and enhancing form protections. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the business credibility is high, supported by clear contact information and EU co-financed projects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching c-copy.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on printing and publishing services. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing market presence, advanced printing technologies (HP Indigo, Canon), and integrated logistics. Revenue streams likely include B2B contracts with industrial clients and B2C sales via their FotoFinish.cz brand. Target customers range from large industrial clients to individual consumers such as photographers and students. The company benefits from EU funding projects that enhance digital transformation and automation. Strategic partnerships include the FotoFinish.cz brand. The company demonstrates a solid operational foundation with opportunities for digital modernization.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is moderate but shows gaps. The lack of HTTPS enforcement on all scripts, absence of security headers, and missing anti-bot measures on forms expose the site to potential risks such as data interception and spam. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security governance. GDPR compliance is questionable due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries may introduce vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enforce HTTPS across the entire website including all external scripts to eliminate mixed content risks.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Integrate CAPTCHA or other anti-bot mechanisms on contact forms to reduce spam and abuse.
  5. Update JavaScript libraries and audit third-party scripts regularly to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
C-COPY Centrum s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ-25056085
Registration number
C 45827
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
C-COPY Centrum s.r.o.
Description
C-COPY Centrum s.r.o. is a Czech company specializing in express digital printing with one of the largest available capacities. They provide high-quality color and black-and-white printing using HP Indigo 7600 and Canon technologies. The company serves multiple sectors including automotive industry, banking, publishing, and public services. They offer integrated printing solutions, logistics, and personalized services for B2B and B2C customers, including photography and photobook production under the brand FotoFinish.cz.
Key services
digital printing, offset printing, logistics and order processing, photobook and photography products, express and personalized printing services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.1, Google Analytics, Typekit fonts, Slimbox2, Custom JS utilities
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS inferred from Google Analytics script loaded over HTTP (mixed content risk)
  • Form uses POST method with hidden fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  4. Website uses older jQuery version (1.11.1) which may have security risks.
  5. Google Analytics is loaded over HTTP, which is a security concern.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  7. Business is well-established with clear sector focus and EU co-financed projects.
  8. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD) or schema.org markup found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with legacy jQuery 1.11.1 and several JavaScript utilities. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit and Google Fonts. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking but loaded partially over HTTP, causing mixed content issues. The site has basic mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags but lacks structured data markup. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are minimal. The technical stack is functional but dated, suggesting modernization opportunities to improve security, performance, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with c-copy.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review c-copy.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.