Bundesinstitut für Öffentliche Gesundheit (BIÖG) · Government · Germany
Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.
The Bundesinstitut für Öffentliche Gesundheit (BIÖG) is a German federal government institute dedicated to public health education, prevention, and research. It operates as a national authority providing comprehensive health information and services to the German population, healthcare professionals, and educators. The website serves as a central platform for disseminating health-related content, research studies, and public health campaigns, positioning BIÖG as a trusted and authoritative source in the healthcare sector. The organization is under the umbrella of the Federal Ministry of Health, reinforcing its governmental status and mission. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS and hosted on government infrastructure, ensuring reliability and compliance with German federal standards. The site employs privacy-respecting analytics (Matomo) and modern web technologies, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The content is well-structured, professionally presented, and navigable, supporting a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site implements strong HTTP security headers, including HSTS with preload, CSP, and X-Frame-Options. However, the SSL configuration lacks support for modern TLS versions, which is a notable gap. The privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR-compliant, with a clear consent mechanism. No explicit security policy or incident response contact is published, indicating room for improvement in transparency and security maturity. Overall, BIÖG's website demonstrates a strong commitment to public health communication, privacy, and security best practices, with opportunities to enhance SSL protocols and security disclosures to further strengthen trust and resilience.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention bzga.de, from OffSeq Breach.
6 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bzga.de.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with bzga.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bzga.de.