Skip to main content

Security report for bylinkovazahradavaltice.cz

Bylinková zahrada Lu & Tiree Chmelar · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bylinková zahrada Lu & Tiree Chmelar is a small, well-established herbal garden located in Valtice, Czech Republic, offering visitors educational experiences, workshops, and a retail shop for herbal products. The garden is dedicated to the memory of its founders and is situated within a UNESCO heritage site, enhancing its cultural and touristic value. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear navigation and relevant content aimed at a general audience interested in nature, herbs, and wellness. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, utilizing modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Font Awesome. It integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking and employs GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms via the Complianz plugin. The site is hosted on a Czech hosting provider and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communications. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices including the use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms and cookie consent management. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contact, which are recommended for enhanced security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the website is trustworthy, compliant with privacy regulations, and provides a positive user experience. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency would further strengthen its security and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bylinkovazahradavaltice.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The herbal garden operates primarily as a non-profit or educational entity with additional revenue streams from workshops and retail sales of herbal products. Its unique positioning within a UNESCO site and recognition in local awards provide competitive advantages. The target audience includes tourists, nature enthusiasts, and individuals interested in herbal medicine and natural wellness. The garden maintains active partnerships and visibility through social media and local tourism platforms. The business model focuses on experiential visits, education, and community engagement, supported by a modest but consistent online presence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of reCAPTCHA to prevent spam. Cookie consent is managed in compliance with GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which limits readiness for handling security incidents. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the analyzed content, but regular updates and security audits are advisable to maintain security.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Conduct periodic security assessments and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bylinková zahrada Lu & Tiree Chmelar
Description
Bylinková zahrada ve Valticích je ukázková přírodní zahrada s více než 300 druhy bylin, věnovaná památce manželů Lu a Tiree Chmelar. Nabízí návštěvníkům poznání, inspiraci a kurzy, a provozuje bylinkový obchůdek.
Key services
garden visits, educational workshops, herbal product sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, WooCommerce 10.0.2, jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google reCAPTCHA, Instagram Feed plugin, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent management with Complianz plugin
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Instagram Feed, Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established herbal garden site with educational and retail components.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for e-commerce and GDPR compliance.
  3. Has clear cookie and privacy policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No security policy or incident response contact found.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed in the content.
  6. Social media presence is strong with Facebook and Instagram integration.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature and widely supported technology stack centered on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It leverages Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactive elements. The integration of Google Analytics and social media feeds indicates a focus on user engagement and marketing. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization especially in image loading and script management. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt appears low, but ongoing maintenance is necessary to keep plugins and themes up to date and secure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bylinkovazahradavaltice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bylinkovazahradavaltice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.