Skip to main content

Security report for buybox.click

Simply4net Sp. z o.o. · Other · Poland

Partial score · DNS & email only

64/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain buybox.click is registered to Simply4net Sp. z o.o., a Polish company established in 2015. The website currently returns a 404 error with a JSON message indicating no accessible content, suggesting the site is inactive or under development. There is no visible business description, services, or user-facing content to analyze. The technical infrastructure appears minimal with no detected CMS, frameworks, or scripts. Hosting is provided by home.pl, a Polish hosting provider. Security posture is basic with no DNSSEC enabled and no security headers detected. The domain registration data is consistent and legitimate, but the lack of website content and policies significantly reduces trust and credibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of buybox.click. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching buybox.click

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of website content, no detailed business intelligence can be derived beyond the WHOIS data indicating a small Polish company. There are no visible market positioning, business model, or service offerings. No partnerships or related domains are identified. The domain age suggests the business has been established for several years, but the inactive website limits insights into current operations or growth.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS security headers, absence of DNSSEC, and no published security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities are directly observable from the content, but the minimal technical implementation and lack of security best practices indicate a low maturity level. The domain status clientTransferProhibited provides basic transfer protection. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a functional website with clear business information and services to improve trust and credibility.
  2. Implement and publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user transparency.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update SSL/TLS configurations to meet modern security standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. Website returns a 404 error with JSON message 'No route found' indicating no accessible content. No WAF or security challenge detected but content is effectively blocked or missing. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Simply4net Sp. z o.o.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is not accessible, returning a 404 JSON error message
  2. No metadata, forms, scripts, or external links detected in the HTML
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact information or security policies published
  5. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and legitimate
  6. No evidence of advertising, analytics, or tracking technologies
  7. Website appears inactive or under development
  8. No security headers or advanced SSL configurations detected
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a minimal HTML page with a JSON 404 error message, indicating no active content or routing. No CMS, JavaScript libraries, or frameworks are detected. Hosting is via home.pl, a known Polish hosting provider. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers suggests technical debt and security risks. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The domain is moderately aged but the technical implementation is minimal and requires modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium21 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with buybox.click. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review buybox.click.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.