Skip to main content

Security report for promotional-marketing-chocolate.business.site

Other · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain consent.google.com is a subdomain of the well-known google.com domain, used primarily for managing user consent related to privacy and compliance. The content provided is a heavily truncated HTML snippet indicative of a consent management interface, likely part of Google's GDPR compliance infrastructure. Due to the nature of the domain as a subdomain and the lack of WHOIS data, it is clear that this is an internal Google-managed service rather than a standalone business entity. The technical infrastructure appears complex and obfuscated, typical for security and privacy-related pages. However, the content is inaccessible for full analysis due to WAF or security mechanisms blocking detailed inspection. Security posture is presumed strong given Google's standards, but no explicit headers or configurations are visible. Overall, the domain is legitimate and trustworthy as part of Google's ecosystem, but the analysis is limited by content access restrictions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching promotional-marketing-chocolate.business.site

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention promotional-marketing-chocolate.business.site, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
623
Employees
0
Customers
448
Third parties
175
Weak passwords
22%

107 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for promotional-marketing-chocolate.business.site.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

This subdomain serves a critical function in Google's privacy and consent management ecosystem, targeting users primarily in the EU (noted by 'gl=DE' in URL parameters). It supports compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations by managing user consent for cookies and data processing. The business model is service-oriented within Google's broader advertising and data ecosystem. No direct revenue streams or customer-facing business operations are evident from this subdomain alone. The target audience includes end-users and website operators using Google's business services. The domain's role is essential but technical, supporting Google's compliance and trust frameworks.

Security posture

The security posture is assumed to be robust given Google's global reputation and the critical nature of consent management. The presence of obfuscated scripts and strict content security policies is typical for such pages. However, no explicit security headers or SSL details are extractable from the provided data. The domain likely employs strong encryption, secure cookie handling, and compliance with privacy laws. No vulnerabilities or incident response contacts are visible. The lack of WHOIS data is normal for subdomains and does not indicate risk. Overall, the security maturity is high but unverified due to access limitations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable access to full page content for comprehensive security and compliance analysis.
  2. Provide explicit metadata and structured data for better SEO and accessibility.
  3. Include clear links to privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service documents.
  4. Expose security headers and SSL configuration details for transparency.
  5. Maintain updated WHOIS and domain registration information for all public domains.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. WHOIS query returned 'No match for "CONSENT.GOOGLE.COM"' indicating domain is not registered or WHOIS data is restricted. The HTML content is heavily truncated and contains obfuscated scripts typical of a consent or security challenge page. No meaningful content or metadata is accessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Key observations

  1. The domain consent.google.com is a subdomain of google.com and likely managed internally by Google.
  2. WHOIS data is not available for this subdomain, which is expected behavior.
  3. The HTML content is heavily truncated and appears to be part of a consent management interface.
  4. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service documents are directly accessible from this content.
  5. No contact information, emails, or phone numbers are found in the provided content.
  6. No external links or social media links are present in the truncated HTML.
  7. No explicit security headers or SSL configuration details are available from the data.
  8. No advertising or analytics scripts are clearly identifiable due to content truncation.
  9. The page is likely a consent management page used by Google for GDPR or other compliance purposes.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected; content is safe and general audience appropriate.
Technical notes

Notes

The technical infrastructure uses advanced JavaScript with obfuscation and dynamic loading, typical for consent management platforms. The page is designed for high security and privacy compliance, likely integrating with Google's broader identity and advertising systems. No CMS or hosting provider details are visible, but the domain is hosted within Google's infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to content truncation. The use of nonce attributes and strict content security policies suggests a modern and secure implementation. Technical debt or risks are not identifiable from the limited data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 94/100Low8 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with promotional-marketing-chocolate.business.site. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review promotional-marketing-chocolate.business.site.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.