Skip to main content

Security report for bushcraftportal.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

42/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BushcraftPortal.cz is a Czech language website dedicated to providing advice, tips, tutorials, and product reviews for outdoor bushcraft and survival enthusiasts. Established in 2012, it serves a niche audience interested in nature and survival skills, supported by a small but consistent content publishing model. The site integrates multimedia content including a YouTube channel and links to a partner e-commerce site, bushcraftshop.cz. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and uses common SEO and social sharing plugins, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no obvious vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies, which is a notable gap given the use of tracking technologies like Facebook Pixel. Overall, the website is functional, professionally designed, and trustworthy within its niche, but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bushcraftportal.cz

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
48
Average
42

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a specialized content portal in the outdoor and bushcraft market, targeting hobbyists and enthusiasts primarily in the Czech Republic. Its business model revolves around content creation and affiliate marketing, leveraging product reviews and partnerships with related e-commerce sites. The presence of a YouTube channel and active blog posts suggests ongoing engagement and content freshness. The site’s market position is niche but stable, with consistent branding and a focused audience. There is no evidence of large-scale commercial operations or parent company affiliations, indicating a small independent operation. The partnership with bushcraftshop.cz is a key strategic relationship supporting its commercial activities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy risks, especially without clear cookie consent mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. To improve, the site should adopt security best practices including security headers, vulnerability disclosure policies, and enhanced privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security posture.
  4. Audit and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain technical and security standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Rady, tipy, návody, recenze produktů pro život v přírodě.
Key services
bushcraft tips and advice, product reviews, survival and outdoor tutorials, YouTube video content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.7, Bootstrap CSS, Font Awesome, Yoast SEO plugin, Shareaholic social sharing, Facebook Pixel, YouTube iframe API, Commerce.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Facebook Pixel and other tracking scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Sovrn
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Shareaholic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech language bushcraft and outdoor survival portal.
  2. Content includes articles, product reviews, and YouTube video integration.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and social sharing.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Active content with recent posts dated 2024 and 2025.
  8. External links mostly to related bushcraftshop.cz and social media platforms.
  9. Tracking includes Facebook Pixel and Shareaholic scripts.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.7, using Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for icons. SEO is managed via the Yoast SEO plugin, and social sharing is enabled through Shareaholic. The site loads asynchronously several third-party scripts including Facebook Pixel and Commerce.js, which may impact performance but are common in e-commerce and marketing contexts. Hosting is managed via a Czech registrar with name servers at forpsi.net and forpsi.it. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but security headers are missing. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small content site but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bushcraftportal.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bushcraftportal.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.