Skip to main content

Security report for buron-avocat.fr

Buron - Avocat · Other · France

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website buron-avocat.fr represents a small legal practice operating in the Forbach and Saarbrücken regions, providing legal services primarily to French and German-speaking clients. The site itself is minimal, serving mainly as a redirect to a localized subdirectory, with very limited content on the landing page. The business appears to be established since 2009, supported by a mature domain registration. However, the digital presence is basic and lacks modern web features or comprehensive business information. From a technical perspective, the website is hosted on an Apache server via IONOS SE, but it lacks HTTPS support and a valid SSL/TLS certificate, which is a significant security concern. The site does not implement security headers or advanced web technologies, and performance data is unavailable, indicating potential slow or unoptimized loading. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking tools, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which raises compliance concerns. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, lack of security headers, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The domain registration is consistent and mature, but the lack of domain protection locks and security best practices lowers trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a low security and privacy compliance profile, which could impact user trust and regulatory adherence. Strategic recommendations include immediate implementation of HTTPS with a valid certificate, addition of privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR, enhancement of security headers, and inclusion of clear contact information to improve business credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching buron-avocat.fr

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Buron - Avocat operates as a small legal service provider targeting clients in the Forbach and Saarbrücken areas. The business model is traditional professional services with a focus on legal consultation and representation. The website's minimal content and lack of detailed business information suggest a localized, possibly boutique practice without extensive digital marketing or e-commerce capabilities. The domain's maturity supports business legitimacy, but the absence of trust signals such as certifications or client testimonials limits competitive advantage. There is no indication of partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth potential may be constrained by the limited online presence and lack of modern digital engagement strategies.

Security posture

The current security posture is poor, primarily due to the lack of HTTPS and SSL/TLS encryption, exposing users to potential data interception risks. The absence of security headers and no evidence of vulnerability management or incident response policies further weaken the security stance. No GDPR compliance indicators or data protection officer contacts are present, which may expose the business to regulatory risks. The server uses Apache but appears outdated given the last-modified date and lack of modern protocols. Immediate remediation is required to secure communications and enhance trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide to secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Include clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Consider deploying a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate commitment to security and facilitate responsible reporting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache server provided by IONOS SE, with a domain registered since 2009. The site uses basic HTML and CSS without any detected CMS or modern JavaScript frameworks. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the lack of optimization and mobile responsiveness is evident from the minimal content and redirect behavior. No analytics or tracking technologies are present, indicating low digital maturity. The absence of HTTPS and security best practices represents a significant technical risk. The DNS setup is standard but lacks DNSSEC and CAA records, which could improve domain security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is outdated and requires modernization to meet current web standards and security expectations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with buron-avocat.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review buron-avocat.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.