Skip to main content

Security report for bureauveritas.lv

Bureau Veritas Latvia · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bureau Veritas Latvia operates as a local branch of the global leader in testing, inspection, and certification services. The company offers a broad portfolio of services including quality, safety, environmental certifications, verification services for emissions and sustainability, inspections, audits, and professional training. Their market position is strong, supported by global brand recognition and multiple accreditations. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, integrates modern consent management and analytics tools, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, providing a reliable digital presence for the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bureauveritas.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses and organizations across multiple sectors including energy, transport, manufacturing, real estate, and government. Their business model focuses on providing specialized services that support compliance, risk management, and sustainability. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear service offerings and links to parent and career sites, indicating a well-structured partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include comprehensive service coverage and emphasis on certifications and verifications aligned with global standards. The absence of direct contact emails suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via contact forms.

Security posture

The security maturity level is good, with HTTPS enforced, security headers present, and no exposed sensitive data. The use of a consent management platform indicates attention to privacy compliance. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents gaps in transparency and readiness. There are no detected vulnerabilities or insecure libraries in the visible content. The website would benefit from enhanced accessibility features and explicit security documentation to improve trust and compliance further.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Increase transparency by including direct company contact emails and phone numbers for customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bureau Veritas Latvia
Description
Bureau Veritas is a global leader in testing, inspection, and certification services, supporting clients in quality assurance, cost reduction, efficiency improvement, and sustainable culture promotion.
Key services
Quality, occupational health and safety, environment certification, Verification services (CORSIA, EU ETS, etc.), Inspections and audits, Industrial services and assessments, Training, courses, and seminars
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Didomi Consent Management SDK
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong focus on compliance and certifications.
  3. Consent management is implemented effectively.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on homepage; contact form used.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. Use of modern CMS and tracking technologies.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and secure CMS platform, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Didomi for consent management. The site uses responsive design techniques and serves optimized images for different devices. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by external SDKs and tracking scripts. The technical implementation follows good SEO and accessibility basics but could improve in accessibility compliance. No hosting provider details were detected from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure online presence with room for optimization in performance and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bureauveritas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bureauveritas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.