Skip to main content

Security report for burdadigital.cz

Other · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed website is a Jira Service Management customer portal page hosted on Atlassian's cloud infrastructure under the subdomain burdadigital.atlassian.net. It serves as a service desk ticket submission interface, primarily targeting internal or customer support users. The site is part of Atlassian's managed cloud environment, which explains the absence of independent WHOIS data and domain registration details. The page content is minimal and functional, focusing on service request creation rather than marketing or business presentation. Technically, the site uses Atlassian's proprietary technologies and the Statsig SDK for feature management and analytics. Security posture is good with enforced HTTPS and some security headers, but lacks comprehensive headers like CSP or HSTS. Privacy and cookie policies are not present on this page, which is typical for internal service portals but reduces privacy compliance scores. Overall, the site is legitimate as part of Atlassian's cloud services but provides limited business or contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching burdadigital.cz

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
65
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

This portal is likely used by Burda Digital or its affiliates for internal or customer support ticketing via Atlassian Jira Service Management. The business model revolves around providing digital services or support, but no explicit business details are present on this page. The domain is a subdomain of Atlassian's cloud domain, indicating reliance on Atlassian's SaaS platform. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries linked from this page. The target audience is internal users or customers needing support. The lack of marketing content or business descriptions suggests this is a functional support tool rather than a public-facing business site.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes some tracing headers, indicating a secure transport layer. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The use of Atlassian's cloud platform provides inherent security benefits, but additional header configurations are recommended. Privacy compliance is low due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Incident response and security contact information are not provided on this page.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  2. Add privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements to improve privacy posture.
  3. Provide visible contact information or links to support and security incident response contacts.
  4. Review form input validation and sanitization to prevent injection or abuse.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Java, Atlassian Jira Service Management, Statsig SDK
Frameworks
Atlassian Jira Service Management
Platforms
Atlassian Cloud
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers for tracing

Analytics and tracking

Services
Statsig
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Jira Service Management customer portal page hosted on Atlassian Cloud.
  2. No WHOIS data available for subdomain as expected.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page.
  4. No explicit contact information or business details present on this page.
  5. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  6. Uses Atlassian's Statsig SDK for feature flagging and analytics.
  7. Security headers are minimal but HTTPS is enforced.
  8. Content is minimal and functional for service desk ticket creation.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on Atlassian's Jira Service Management cloud platform, using Java and Atlassian's proprietary frameworks. It includes the Statsig Java SDK for feature flagging and analytics. The HTML is valid and the site is mobile optimized with basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, typical of SaaS portals. There is no CMS detected beyond Atlassian's platform. Hosting is provided by Atlassian Cloud, ensuring reliable uptime and security. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and comprehensive metadata beyond basic page title and viewport settings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with burdadigital.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review burdadigital.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.