Skip to main content

Security report for bulta.lv

Other · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bulta.lv serves as an event portal for a running and Nordic walking competition held in Latvia, specifically the Sigulda-Nurmiži-Sigulda 21km event. It provides registration forms, event results, photos, and competition rules primarily targeting local sports enthusiasts and participants. The site uses a simple HTML5 UP template with JavaScript and jQuery for interactive form handling, indicating a modest technical infrastructure suitable for small-scale event management. The content is basic but functional, with clear navigation links to event results and documentation. However, the site lacks comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance given its European audience. Security posture is moderate with no visible advanced security headers or protections, and no WHOIS data could be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional for its purpose but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and business transparency to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bulta.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bulta.lv operates in the niche market of local sports event organization in Latvia, focusing on running and Nordic walking competitions. Its business model revolves around event registration and information dissemination, with revenue likely derived from participation fees as indicated by the form fee logic. The target audience is local athletes and sports enthusiasts. The website's limited external partnerships and absence of advanced marketing or analytics tools suggest a small-scale operation. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or contact details constrains its market credibility. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence, improved compliance, and expanded service offerings. The Facebook link indicates some social media engagement, but broader digital marketing strategies appear minimal.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS assumed but not explicitly confirmed. No security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected in the HTML content. The form handling includes JavaScript logic for category and fee selection but lacks visible advanced input validation or anti-CSRF tokens. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are present, indicating limited security governance. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further exposes compliance risks under GDPR. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy concerns but also limit user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small event site but requiring enhancements to protect user data and comply with regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance site security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and security culture.
  5. Conduct a WHOIS domain registration update or verification to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Skrējiens/nūjošanas pārgājiens Sigulda-Nurmiži-Sigulda, skrējiens ar tubu, Nurmiži vai izjokosim, pusmaratons, bulta.lv
Key services
Organizing running and Nordic walking events, Providing event registration, Publishing event results, Sharing event photos and rules
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery
Frameworks
HTML5 UP
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed but not confirmed from data
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an event registration and information portal for a running and Nordic walking event in Latvia.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  5. No security headers or advanced security features detected in the HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  7. Site uses basic HTML5 UP template with jQuery and custom JavaScript for form handling.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a simple HTML5 UP template using HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and jQuery. It includes custom JavaScript for dynamic form category selection and fee calculation based on user input. The site loads external resources such as Facebook icons and links to external domains for event results and photos. No CMS or advanced backend technologies are evident from the HTML content. Performance appears moderate with fixed background images and responsive design elements. Mobile optimization is good due to viewport meta tags and responsive CSS. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords but no Open Graph or structured data found. Accessibility features are minimal with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bulta.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bulta.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.