Skip to main content

Security report for builtt.io

Builtt.io · E-commerce · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Builtt.io is a specialized digital agency focused on delivering high-quality and long-term technology solutions in e-commerce, website development, and digital product creation. The company targets a diverse client base ranging from startups to multinational enterprises, emphasizing effective, captivating, and innovative digital solutions. Their market position is strengthened by multiple industry awards and a portfolio of over 108 clients, reflecting a strong reputation in the e-commerce and digital product development sectors. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including JavaScript libraries such as GSAP and jQuery, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, supported by the Rank Math SEO plugin. Hosting and domain management involve reputable providers like GoDaddy and Cloudflare, although DNSSEC is not enabled. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms, ensuring user privacy and regulatory compliance. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and publishing explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Builtt.io presents a professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained digital presence with a solid business foundation and technical infrastructure. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing detailed security and incident response policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching builtt.io

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Builtt.io operates as an essential entity within the e-commerce and technology sectors, providing integrated services in e-commerce, website, and product development. Their business model revolves around service delivery to a broad client base, including startups and large enterprises. The company leverages a strong partnership ecosystem, including Degordian and Clutch, to enhance market reach and credibility. Growth indicators such as 8 years of experience and over 108 clients, combined with multiple awards, position Builtt.io competitively. The agency's revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and long-term client engagements. Their digital maturity is evidenced by modern technology adoption and comprehensive GDPR compliance.

Security posture

The security posture of Builtt.io is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS, uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized changes, and provides a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options indicates potential areas for enhancement. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could impact incident handling readiness. The site shows no signs of malware, phishing, or exposed credentials. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit GDPR compliance mechanisms and update privacy policies to reflect evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Builtt.io
Description
Dedicated to providing quality & long-term tech solutions for e-commerce, products, and websites that support business goals.
Key services
E-commerce development, Website development, Product development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, GSAP, Google Tag Manager, Rank Math SEO plugin, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress theme framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security flags in domain status (clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong focus on e-commerce and digital product development services
  3. Active use of GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms
  4. Multiple industry awards and client references enhance trust
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via form
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
  7. No DNSSEC enabled; domain status flags enhance domain security
  8. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and SEO plugins
  9. No signs of malware or phishing detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress platform with a custom theme and uses modern JavaScript libraries including GSAP for animations and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets asynchronously to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is excellent, with responsive images and layouts. SEO is enhanced by the Rank Math plugin, providing structured data and meta tags. Hosting is managed via GoDaddy registrar with Cloudflare DNS, though DNSSEC is not enabled. The site shows moderate performance with room for improvement in caching and security headers. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with builtt.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review builtt.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.