Skip to main content

Security report for budzetyjst.pl

EuroInnowacje Software Sp. z o.o. · Government · Poland

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Budżety JST is a Polish web portal dedicated to presenting local government unit budgets in a transparent and accessible manner. The platform targets both local governments and residents, offering a user-friendly interface with personalized graphical elements and integration with budget management systems. The service includes features such as a built-in salary calculator to help residents understand tax expenditures. The company behind the portal is EuroInnowacje Software Sp. z o.o., a small-sized entity founded in 2018, operating primarily in the government sector within Poland. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3 with Bootstrap grid, and Google Fonts. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear, professional design. However, it lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indications and does not include analytics or tracking scripts, reflecting a minimalistic approach to user data collection. From a security perspective, the site does not implement DNSSEC, security headers, or visible HTTPS enforcement in the provided data, which limits its security posture. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Contact information is clearly provided, but no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content detected. The overall risk is moderate with recommendations to improve security headers, enable DNSSEC, add privacy and cookie policies, and implement vulnerability disclosure practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching budzetyjst.pl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Budżety JST occupies a niche market focused on local government budget transparency in Poland. Its competitive advantage lies in integration with existing budget systems and a simple, personalized interface for residents. The business model appears to be B2G and B2C, providing services to government units and their constituents. Revenue streams likely include service contracts with local governments and possibly consulting or software integration fees. The partnership ecosystem includes organizations like Fundacja na Rzecz Wsparcia Innowacji w JST and EuroInnowacje Sp. z o.o., which also acts as the service provider. The company demonstrates moderate growth potential given its specialized focus and partnerships but lacks visible certifications or broader market presence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a basic security maturity level. It lacks critical security headers and DNSSEC, which are important for protecting against common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR, which is critical for EU-based services. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface, but also limit user engagement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which reduces transparency and preparedness. The SSL configuration is unknown but presumed present due to HTTPS usage in links. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Conduct a security audit to verify SSL/TLS configuration and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EuroInnowacje Software Sp. z o.o.
Description
Portal to present budgets of local government units (JST) in a simple way, enabling residents to see expenditures and revenues for a given budget year.
Key services
Budget presentation portal, Integration with budget management systems, Personalized graphical interface, Built-in salary calculator for tax expenditure transparency
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap Grid, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Roboto)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected to collect sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  2. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  3. No forms detected for data collection, reducing attack surface.
  4. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  6. Website is focused on Polish local government budget transparency.
  7. Partner and service provider logos and links are present, indicating business ecosystem.
  8. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  9. No explicit or adult content detected.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic but modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3 with Bootstrap grid, and Google Fonts. It does not use a known CMS or advanced JavaScript frameworks, which simplifies maintenance but may limit scalability. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive grid usage. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no Open Graph or structured data. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. Hosting is likely provided by home.pl S.A., a reputable Polish hosting provider. Technical risks include lack of security headers and DNSSEC, which could expose the site to certain attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with budzetyjst.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review budzetyjst.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.