Skip to main content

Security report for bucetagostosa.top

Buceta Gostosa · Other · United States

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Buceta Gostosa is an adult content website primarily targeting Portuguese-speaking audiences with pornographic videos. The site operates on a WordPress platform with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Flowplayer for video playback. It monetizes through advertising networks like JuicyAds and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The website lacks critical compliance elements such as privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and does not provide any contact or business transparency information. WHOIS data is inconsistent, showing a future creation date and privacy protection, which reduces trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, exposing it to potential security risks. Overall, the site demonstrates basic technical implementation and content quality but falls short in privacy compliance and business credibility, resulting in a low to moderate risk profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bucetagostosa.top

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the niche adult entertainment sector, focusing on Portuguese-speaking users. Its business model relies on advertising revenue, with partnerships indicated by banner links to similar adult content sites. The lack of transparent business information and contact details suggests a low level of corporate maturity and potential anonymity. The domain's registration inconsistencies and privacy protection are common in adult content sites but negatively impact trust. The site appears to be small in size and newly founded, with limited branding consistency and no visible certifications or trust signals. Growth potential may be limited by compliance and security shortcomings.

Security posture

Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no DNSSEC or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. The site uses external scripts and link redirection mechanisms that could be exploited if not properly secured. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected and inconsistent, which is a red flag for legitimacy. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web threats and lacks a mature security framework.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and implement comprehensive security headers to harden the website against attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide transparent contact information including business and security contacts to enhance credibility.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Audit and secure all external scripts and link redirection to prevent abuse and malicious exploitation.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Buceta Gostosa
Description
Videos porno de bucetas gostosas
Key services
Adult video streaming, Advertising
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Flowplayer, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
JuicyAds
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content platform targeting Portuguese speakers.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business transparency provided.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and external scripts.
  5. Advertising is present via JuicyAds network.
  6. Some external links redirect through suspicious intermediary domains.
  7. WHOIS data is inconsistent and privacy protected, reducing trust.
  8. No advanced security headers or DNSSEC implemented.
  9. Site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with plugins such as Yoast SEO and Flowplayer for video content. It uses jQuery 3.6.0 and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy.com. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices but basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by Yoast with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. However, the site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are important for modern web security. The domain WHOIS data shows suspicious future creation dates and privacy protection, indicating potential registration anomalies. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bucetagostosa.top. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bucetagostosa.top.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.