Skip to main content

Security report for btc.at

ELITEDOMAINS · Other · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website btc.at is a domain sales landing page operated through ELITEDOMAINS, a domain marketplace and escrow service provider. It offers the domain btc.at for sale with clear instructions on the purchase process, payment methods, and domain transfer. The site targets individuals and businesses interested in acquiring premium domains. Technically, the site is built using Angular framework with modern web fonts and responsive design, providing a good user experience and basic SEO optimization. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers or explicit HTTPS enforcement in the HTML, but the use of escrow and verified payment methods adds trust. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy linked externally but no cookie consent mechanism visible. Business credibility is moderate due to the lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers, relying instead on a contact form linked to the marketplace platform. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in security transparency and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching btc.at

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ELITEDOMAINS operates as a domain marketplace and escrow service, positioning itself as a trusted intermediary for domain sales. The btc.at domain sale page leverages this platform to offer a premium domain with a straightforward buying process. The business model focuses on facilitating secure transactions between domain owners and buyers, generating revenue through domain sales commissions and escrow services. The target customers are domain investors, startups, and businesses seeking valuable domain names. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processing and domain management platforms under the ELITEDOMAINS brand. Growth indicators are limited due to the single domain sale focus, but the marketplace's broader presence supports scalability. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing direct communication channels and expanding marketing transparency to increase buyer confidence.

Security posture

The security maturity of the btc.at website is moderate. The site benefits from the escrow service's secure payment handling and verified domain ownership, reducing transactional risks. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting transparency. The site does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident. To improve, the site should implement standard security headers, enforce HTTPS strictly, and publish clear security and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and readiness.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer support.
  5. Ensure HTTPS enforcement with visible SSL indicators and optimize performance for faster loading times.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ELITEDOMAINS
Description
The website offers the domain btc.at for sale through the ELITEDOMAINS escrow service at a fixed price. It provides information on how to buy the domain directly from the holder, payment methods, and domain transfer process.
Key services
Domain sales, Escrow payment service, Domain transfer facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 19.2.11, Web fonts (Montserrat, Material Icons), CSS Grid, JavaScript modules
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of escrow service for secure transactions
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
elitedomains.de script.manual.js
Marketing tools
elitedomains.de tracking script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain sales landing page for btc.at
  2. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found
  3. Contact is via a form linked to ELITEDOMAINS checkout system
  4. No privacy or cookie banners visible on the page
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. Content is multilingual with language selector
  7. No social media links or company addresses found
  8. No visible SSL/TLS certificate details in HTML but uses HTTPS URLs
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 19.2.11, utilizing modern web fonts and CSS Grid for layout. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. The site loads JavaScript modules and uses a tracking script from elitedomains.de for marketing purposes. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The technical stack is modern but lacks some best practices in security headers and privacy mechanisms. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated libraries. Opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and implement comprehensive SEO and security optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with btc.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review btc.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.