Skip to main content

Security report for bta.art

Digital Privacy Corporation · Other · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BTA ART is a niche online platform showcasing a curated collection of contemporary artworks representing the Baltic States. The website serves as a digital gallery featuring artworks and artist profiles, targeting art enthusiasts and collectors interested in this regional art segment. The business operates under a privacy-protected domain registration, indicating a preference for anonymity or privacy in ownership. The platform's market position is focused on cultural and artistic representation rather than commercial sales or broad e-commerce. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3 with advanced animations, SVG graphics, and Bootstrap for responsive design. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with good navigation clarity and professional design quality. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or advanced analytics tools, suggesting a relatively simple but effective technical infrastructure. From a security perspective, the domain is registered with privacy protection and has clientTransferProhibited status, which are positive trust indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and contact information reduces the overall security posture and compliance level. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the provided content. Overall, the website is a professional and safe platform for its intended audience but lacks comprehensive privacy and security policies. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC, and privacy compliance would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bta.art

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BTA ART operates as a specialized art platform focusing on contemporary Baltic States art. Its business model revolves around showcasing and promoting artworks and artists rather than direct sales or transactional services. The company benefits from a niche market position with a culturally focused target audience. The use of privacy protection in domain registration suggests a cautious approach to public business identity. The platform does not currently display partnerships, certifications, or extensive contact information, which may limit its commercial reach but maintains a focused cultural mission. Growth opportunities could include expanding artist collaborations, adding e-commerce capabilities, and enhancing digital marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with domain privacy protection and transfer lock status. However, critical security enhancements are missing, including DNSSEC, security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and clearly published privacy and cookie policies. The lack of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited readiness for security incidents. No tracking or analytics scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for significant improvement to meet GDPR and modern web security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of website scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Digital Privacy Corporation
Description
BTA Art is an evolving collection of carefully selected artworks that best represents characteristics of contemporary art in the Baltic States.
Key services
artworks showcase, artist profiles, information about BTA ART, contact services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Mulish), SVG
Frameworks
Bootstrap (navbar classes detected)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the HTML content.
  3. No social media links detected.
  4. Website uses modern CSS animations and SVG logos.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Website content is professional and focused on art collection.
  8. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  9. No explicit or adult content present.
  10. Domain WHOIS data shows privacy protection and clientTransferProhibited status.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a clean and modern front-end stack with HTML5, CSS3 animations, SVG logos, and Bootstrap framework for responsive design. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and hosts images and scripts on its own domain. No CMS or backend technologies were detected from the provided content. Performance is moderate with some advanced CSS animations that may impact load times slightly. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph tags. Hosting and domain registration are managed by 101domain GRS Limited with privacy protection enabled. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bta.art. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bta.art.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.