Skip to main content

Security report for bswllp.com

Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, L.L.P. · Other · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in DNS health, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, L.L.P. is a professional law firm operating primarily in Louisiana with offices in Baton Rouge and New Orleans. The firm offers a broad range of legal services including labor and employment law, healthcare law, corporate law, and litigation. Their website presents a professional image with detailed attorney profiles, legal articles, and news updates, targeting businesses and individuals seeking legal counsel in the region. The firm maintains an active presence on major social media platforms, enhancing their outreach and client engagement. Technically, the website leverages modern frontend technologies such as Vue.js and Bootstrap, combined with jQuery and slick carousel for interactive elements. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. Analytics tools like Clicky and WiseAdmin are used for visitor tracking, but privacy compliance could be improved with explicit cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, no security headers were detected in the HTML content, and there is no visible security policy or incident response contact information. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trustworthiness, though the professional content and consistent branding support legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency. The overall risk assessment indicates a well-maintained professional website with minor gaps in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding cookie consent banners, publishing security and incident response policies, and resolving WHOIS data inconsistencies to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bswllp.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, L.L.P. holds a solid market position as a regional law firm in Louisiana, serving a diverse client base including businesses and individuals. Their competitive advantage lies in a broad spectrum of legal expertise and a strong local presence with two main offices. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on legal counsel and representation. Revenue streams likely derive from client retainers, litigation fees, and consulting services. The firm actively publishes articles and hosts events, indicating engagement with the legal community and clients. Partnerships with legal industry service providers and a professional website design contribute to their brand strength. Growth indicators include recent news about attorney additions and recognition in regional business reports. The firm’s digital presence is supported by social media channels and marketing tools like Constant Contact, enhancing client communication and lead generation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific indicators. The use of third-party analytics and tracking pixels introduces moderate user tracking, necessitating clearer privacy disclosures. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could be enhanced by adopting recognized frameworks, publishing security policies, and improving user privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve privacy compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Resolve WHOIS data inconsistencies by ensuring domain registration information is accurate and publicly available.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, L.L.P.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, L.L.P.
Description
Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, L.L.P. is a law firm based in Baton Rouge and New Orleans, Louisiana, providing legal services across multiple practice areas including labor and employment, healthcare, corporate law, litigation, and more.
Key services
Attorneys, Legal Services, Labor & Employment, Healthcare Law, Corporate Law, Litigation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Vue.js, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Clicky, WiseAdmin Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Clicky, WiseAdmin Stats
Marketing tools
Constant Contact
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional law firm website with detailed attorney profiles and legal articles
  2. No visible forms collecting personal data on homepage
  3. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, X, Instagram
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner detected
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  6. No incident response or security contact information found
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual for a law firm domain
  8. Website uses modern frontend technologies and good SEO practices
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern frontend stack including Vue.js and Bootstrap, providing responsive design and interactive features. The use of Google Fonts and Font Awesome enhances visual appeal. Performance is moderate with standard JavaScript libraries and carousel plugins. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Accessibility features are basic, indicating room for improvement to meet standards such as WCAG. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured content. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Technical risks are low but include missing security headers and partial privacy compliance. Opportunities exist to modernize accessibility and enhance security configurations to reduce technical debt and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bswllp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bswllp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.