Skip to main content

Security report for bsplegal.lt

BSP Legal · Other · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BSP Legal is a specialized Lithuanian law firm offering high-quality legal services with over 15 years of experience. The firm emphasizes direct client communication and trust, providing services such as litigation, arbitration, business legal support, contracts, transport law, and insurance claims. The website reflects a professional legal services provider targeting clients in Lithuania. Technically, the site uses an older CMS (EasyWeb3) and JavaScript libraries including jQuery 1.10.1 and Fancybox, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking important security headers and privacy policies, which reduces compliance and trust. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bsplegal.lt

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a trusted legal services provider with a focus on client relationships and specialized legal areas. Its business model is service-based, targeting individuals and businesses needing legal assistance in Lithuania. The website content and contact details support credibility, though lack of privacy and terms policies may affect compliance perception. The firm appears small-sized with no parent or subsidiary companies indicated. The partnership with freshmedia.lt for website development is noted. The absence of analytics and tracking suggests a privacy-conscious approach or limited digital marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries may expose vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries to current versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Publish incident response and security contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user behavior and improve services.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BSP Legal
Description
Specialized law firm providing highest quality legal services with over 15 years of experience, emphasizing direct client communication and trust.
Key services
Teisminiai ginčai ir arbitražas, Verslo teisinis aptarnavimas, Gyventojų teisinės konsultacijos, Sutartys ir teisiniai dokumentai, Transportas ir ekspedicija, Draudimas ir žalos atlyginimas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 1.10.1, Fancybox, Maximage, EasyWeb3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with company email, phone, and address.
  5. Website uses older JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.10.1) which may pose security risks.
  6. No security headers detected, indicating room for security improvements.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  8. Website content is professional and relevant to legal services.
  9. No social media links except LinkedIn company page.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage content provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the EasyWeb3 CMS platform and uses JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.10.1, Fancybox, and Maximage for UI effects and sliders. The site loads multiple CSS and JS files with versioning parameters, indicating some maintenance. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags detected. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. The site lacks modern frameworks or platforms and could benefit from modernization to improve performance, security, and SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bsplegal.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bsplegal.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.