Skip to main content

Security report for brookenotonadiet.com

Brooke: Not On a Diet · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Brooke: Not On a Diet is a personal blog centered on fitness, health, and lifestyle topics, primarily targeting individuals interested in weight loss and healthy living. The site offers personal experiences, fitness challenges, and product recommendations through affiliate marketing. The business model is content-driven with monetization via ads and affiliate links. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with the Genesis Framework, utilizing common plugins such as Jetpack and Disqus, and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS. Performance and mobile optimization are basic but functional. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is minimal with a basic privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data shows inconsistencies, with a future domain creation date and a drop-catching registrar, which reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the site is a small-scale personal blog with moderate technical and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brookenotonadiet.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in personal health and fitness blogging, leveraging affiliate marketing and advertising for revenue. It targets health-conscious individuals seeking relatable content and fitness motivation. The blog maintains active community engagement through comments and social media channels. Partnerships with Amazon Associates and POPSUGAR Select indicate monetization strategies. The lack of formal business information and professional certifications aligns with its small-scale, personal nature. Growth potential depends on content quality and audience engagement. The site’s reliance on third-party services for analytics and advertising is typical for blogs of this size.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking and content injection. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could allow DNS spoofing attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The site uses common third-party scripts and plugins, which should be regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-specific disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and update privacy policies to reflect GDPR compliance.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a security policy and incident response plan to enhance trust and preparedness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Brooke: Not On a Diet
Description
A personal blog focused on fitness, health, lifestyle, and weight loss journey sharing personal experiences, challenges, and tips.
Key services
Fitness challenges, Health and wellness blogging, Affiliate product recommendations, Community engagement via blog comments and social media
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Jetpack, Disqus
Frameworks
Genesis Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, comScore
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, POPSUGAR Select
Tracking pixels
comScore, Disqus
Marketing tools
Jetpack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal health and fitness blog with active content and community engagement.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy explicitly found except a basic policies page.
  3. No security policies or incident response information available.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed; contact form present.
  5. Uses multiple third-party services including Google Analytics, Disqus, and Amazon affiliate links.
  6. No advanced security headers or DNSSEC enabled.
  7. Domain WHOIS data inconsistent with website content dates.
  8. No signs of adult or explicit content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS using the Genesis Framework, with jQuery and several plugins such as Jetpack and Google Analyticator for analytics. It integrates third-party services including Disqus for comments and Amazon for affiliate marketing. Hosting is behind Cloudflare DNS, but no advanced CDN or performance optimization is evident. The site has basic mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with some external scripts that may impact load times. The WHOIS data inconsistency suggests possible domain registration issues or drop-catching, which should be clarified to avoid trust concerns.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brookenotonadiet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brookenotonadiet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.