Skip to main content

Security report for brokenpussyx.top

Other · United States

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Broken Pussyx is an adult content affiliate website primarily focused on redirecting users to various adult video download links and affiliate adult sites. The site targets an adult audience with explicit content and uses multiple third-party advertising and tracking scripts. The business model relies on affiliate marketing and advertising revenue from adult content referrals. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap and jQuery with several ad network scripts but lacks modern security and privacy features. The site does not enforce HTTPS, lacks privacy and cookie policies, and provides no contact or security information, indicating a low level of digital maturity and professionalism. Security posture is weak with no security headers and multiple suspicious external scripts, increasing risk exposure. Overall, the site presents significant trust and compliance concerns, with a low legitimacy score and poor user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brokenpussyx.top

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult entertainment affiliate niche, targeting adults-only users seeking adult video content. It leverages multiple affiliate and redirect domains to monetize traffic through advertising and affiliate commissions. The site is small in scale, newly created in 2023, and uses privacy-protected WHOIS registration typical for adult sites. There is no clear business entity or contact information, limiting transparency and trust. The site’s competitive advantage lies in aggregating multiple adult affiliate offers and redirect links, but it lacks professionalism and compliance, which may hinder long-term growth and partnership opportunities.

Security posture

The security maturity of the site is low. It lacks HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and any published security or privacy policies. The presence of numerous third-party ad and redirect scripts, some from suspicious domains, increases the risk of malware or unwanted tracking. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are provided. The site does not comply with GDPR or other privacy regulations, exposing it to potential legal risks. Overall, the security posture is inadequate for protecting user data or ensuring safe browsing.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve security.
  4. Remove or audit all third-party scripts to eliminate potential malicious or privacy-invasive code.
  5. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to be an adult content link directory and traffic redirector with downloadable video links and affiliate marketing banners.
Key services
Adult video downloads, Affiliate link redirection, Advertising space for adult sites
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Maps API, Various ad network scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
CPX24, Clickadilla, PopCash, A-Ads
Tracking pixels
adspector.io
Marketing tools
AdManager scripts from multiple providers
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content affiliate and redirect portal.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact or security information provided.
  4. Multiple external scripts and ad networks used, some suspicious.
  5. No HTTPS enforcement detected.
  6. Content and design quality is poor and unprofessional.
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected, typical for adult sites.
  8. Site targets adult audience with explicit content.
  9. No security best practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a basic Bootstrap and jQuery front-end with multiple asynchronous ad network scripts. Hosting is via a registrar-associated DNS provider with no CDN or advanced hosting detected. Performance is moderate but hampered by numerous external scripts. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO and accessibility are poor due to lack of meta descriptions, structured data, and accessibility features. The site lacks a CMS and appears to be a static or minimally dynamic affiliate landing page. Technical debt is high with outdated practices and no evident modernization efforts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brokenpussyx.top. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brokenpussyx.top.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.